每天知道
你的领域
出了什么

In LLM-based agent systems, failures can originate from early steps whose effects propagate through subsequent interactions, making their origins difficult to identify. To trace such failures back to their origin, failure attribution has been formulated as the task of identifying the earliest step responsible for the failure. Recent methods leverage LLM internal signals for failure attribution, typically using hidden states as step representations. We therefore conduct an empirical study to evaluate how effectively these representations distinguish root-cause steps from other steps and find limited separation. Motivated by this observation, we propose ReCast, a step representation learning method that transforms hidden states from a frozen LLM into attribution-oriented step representations. ReCast first selects attribution-relevant layers, then constructs complementary pattern and deviation features, and finally learns contextualized step representations through an encoder trained with contrastive and ranking objectives. We also introduce ReCast-2K, a training dataset for failure attribution. ReCast achieves the best Hit@1 across four benchmarks, surpassing the strongest baseline by 5.65 and 9.19 pp on Who&When Algorithm and Handcrafted, respectively. Code is available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/ReCast-5FB6 .

Large language models (LLMs) often default to Modern Standard Arabic (MSA) when generating Arabic, even when prompted with dialectal Arabic. A natural explanation is that their internal representations are dominated by MSA. We test this hypothesis by adapting the language-dominance framework of Shani and Basirat (2025) (https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.blackboxnlp-1.7) to 26 Arabic varieties. Across layers and model families, we find no evidence that MSA acts as a dominant internal representation for Arabic dialects. Instead, dialect representations form a dense and highly overlapping space: normalized mutual information drops sharply compared to patterns reported for more distinct languages. Moreover, the strongest separability effects are not confined to intermediate layers, but can shift toward later layers depending on the architecture. These findings challenge a common interpretation of MSA-biased generation: output preference does not necessarily reveal internal representational dominance. Analyses of multilingual and dialectal LLMs should therefore distinguish generation bias from the geometry of internal representations.

Reinforcement learning (RL) methods such as GRPO substantially improve large language model reasoning but often suffer from policy entropy collapse: the loss of sampling diversity weakens exploration and limits further improvement. Existing methods address this issue either through algorithm-level interventions, such as reward modification and entropy/KL regularization, or through token-level reweighting. We investigate a complementary perspective: entropy collapse can also be mitigated by changing which generated rollouts contribute to policy updates. Under the same sampling budget, not all rollouts contribute positively to an update, and selectively excluding some can improve learning. To address this, we propose GRPODropout: before the standard update, we use a simple strategy that selectively removes a small number of high-probability positive-advantage rollouts and recenters the retained advantages. To motivate this design, we develop a rollout-level theoretical analysis that guides method design and threshold selection. The method changes only rollout usage, and adds negligible computational overhead. Experiments show higher accuracy than original GRPO and higher actor entropy while using fewer rollout samples for updates, illustrating "less is more." This work provides insight into RL rollout usage: removing some rollouts can improve performance. Code is available at https://github.com/hexuandeng/GRPODropout/.

Large language models (LLMs) can expose memorized training sequences under prefix-based extraction: given a prefix from a training example, the model may assign high probability to the original continuation. In deployed systems, however, prefixes are rarely evaluated in isolation. They often appear together with instructions, retrieved documents, or other task-specific context, as in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG). This motivates examining whether contextual conditioning mitigates memorization or merely changes the set of memorized samples that become extractable. We investigate this issue through paired item-level measurements of probabilistic suffix extraction. For each prefix-suffix pair, we score the target suffix under an empty prompt and under retrieved contexts of varying relevance, across three open-weight instruction-tuned models. We find that context does not simply erase memorization. Instead, extractable memorization consists of a context-robust core and a context-sensitive boundary. Many samples that are extractable without context remain extractable under the retrieved context, especially as the prefix length increases. At the same time, context mainly affects marginal samples near the extraction threshold: it suppresses some exposures, but also enables new ones that are missed by prefix-only evaluation. These findings qualify the view that RAG reduces memorization risk. Context can lower aggregate extraction by suppressing boundary cases, yet robustly extractable samples persist, and context-enabled extractability remains security-relevant.

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) adapts pretrained large language models (LLMs) to downstream tasks, but the required concepts can receive substantially different levels of pretrained support. Frequent concepts are more likely to be well learned, whereas rare concepts may remain weakly represented. We introduce a novel notion named prior barrier to quantify how strongly the pretrained model supports competing concepts over the target concept. We observe that prior barriers follow a long-tail distribution, placing head and tail concepts at different starting points for SFT: head concepts face lower prior barriers, whereas tail concepts require additional instructions to overcome their higher prior barriers. Our theoretical analysis further derives a predictive risk bound for SFT under long-tail prior barriers, explicitly characterizing how the prior barrier and accumulated SFT evidence jointly determine predictive performance. Motivated by this prior barrier-dependent demand, we propose PASS, an adaptive SFT instruction selection method that constructs reference-derived concepts and estimates the distinguishing evidence provided by each instruction, and adaptively allocates the selection budget toward concepts that remain insufficiently covered under the current selection. In this way, PASS jointly considers which instructions can provide useful evidence and where additional supervision is needed under a limited budget. Experiments show that our method consistently outperforms seven state-of-the-art instruction selection methods on four backbone-budget settings. An ablation study further shows that PASS's adaptive allocation consistently improves over uniform allocation.

Weight-only post-training quantization (PTQ) relies heavily on reconstruction loss minimization to preserve model quality at low precision. We show that the weights favored by minimizing this loss need not yield better model performance on new tasks. In fact, we find that lower reconstruction loss can even degrade model performance on the same calibration data. Our analysis further shows that weights with lower reconstruction loss on calibration data can have higher loss than other weights when the distribution of input activations changes. Motivated by these observations and our analysis, we propose Distributionally Robust Quantization (DRQ), a post-hoc refinement process that minimizes worst-case reconstruction loss over a constrained set of input activation distributions. DRQ refines the integer codes representing quantized weights within the existing quantization grid, keeping quantization parameters and inference operators unchanged. Extensive experiments show that DRQ improves models quantized by six representative PTQ methods, including AWQ, GPTQ, and ParoQuant, and delivers gains across both dense and mixture-of-experts large language models. These results establish DRQ as a general post-hoc refinement framework for weight-only PTQ, achieving better downstream performance without adding inference overhead.

AI research agents automate the cycle of proposing, implementing, and evaluating experiments, opening a path toward recursive self-improvement. Yet their ability to propose experiments outpaces their capacity to execute them in real environments, making outcome prediction a key capability for sustained self-improvement under limited experimental budgets. We investigate language models as Research World Models (RWMs), which predict the outcomes of candidate interventions across research environments. Our evaluation draws on over 2,600 experimental records from nine research environments spanning pretraining, post-training, and inference, representing more than 171,000 H100 GPU-hours of experimentation. Research knowledge acquired from real experimental experience improves RWM predictions of unseen interventions within the same environment (Spearman +0.27), and can be reused across environments. For example, using only pretraining experience from OLMo3, Marin, and Nanochat, an RWM reduces selection regret in the Qwen3 environment by 78% compared with zero-experience setting. These benefits extend to multi-round Autoresearch under a fixed selection budget: RWMs with in-env and cross-env research knowledge increase the best gain achieved by 15.8% and 11.6%, respectively. Ablations across 13 language models used as RWMs show that adding research knowledge can improve intervention ranking more than changing models or increasing reasoning effort alone. These findings support language models as RWMs and motivate accumulating experimental data for future RWM training.

Effective source recovery is critical to security applications such as malware analysis, vulnerability assessment, and legacy maintenance. Large Language Models (LLMs) are reshaping this field, shifting the paradigm away from rule-based heuristics to probabilistic and high fidelity semantic recovery of source code from assembly or classical decompiler-derived pseudo-C. However, despite rapid progress, the field suffers from fragmentation across numerous approaches as well as their non-unified evaluations, limiting objective comparisons. Further, existing works have limited coverage of embedded, IoT architectures and source languages beyond C/C++. In this work, we present the first Systematization of Knowledge (SoK) focused specifically on LLM-assisted binary-to-source recovery. We provide a granular design-centric taxonomy of LLM-assisted source recovery methods and systematic evaluations using seven key metrics along six evaluation dimensions. We evaluate state-of-the-art methods on 45,000 test samples derived from four standard and five embedded architectures, five optimization levels, and symbol stripping. We ablate the impact of design choices on recovery performance, including input representation, contextual enrichment, model scale, iteration and review roles using controlled in-house recovery pipelines and three off-the-shelf models. Finally, we test same-language and cross-language recovery capability covering four mature and two legacy languages. Our systematization and comprehensive evaluations provide key insights that guide future directions in this field.

Large language model (LLM)-based agents have demonstrated strong capabilities on complex tasks. They typically perform reasoning before each action throughout an interaction trajectory. However, reasoning may not be necessary at every turn, as reasoning produced earlier can continue to support subsequent actions. A key challenge is therefore to determine when existing reasoning remains sufficient and when a new reasoning step is needed, without relying on costly generation-based verification. We find that decreases in the likelihood of subsequent reference actions after removing additional reasoning closely track whether those actions remain recoverable given earlier reasoning, providing an effective and lightweight signal for estimating cross-turn action support. Based on this observation, we propose Reasoning Adaptation through Cross-Turn Estimation (RACE), a training approach for adaptive agent reasoning. RACE introduces a Likelihood-Guided Progressive Reasoning Cover Detection (LoGiC) procedure that progressively identifies reasoning turns whose removal has limited impact on the current and subsequent reference actions. The resulting removal signals are incorporated into both supervised fine-tuning and agentic reinforcement learning, enabling the policy to learn when to reason and when to act directly. Extensive experiments on four representative agent benchmarks show that RACE substantially reduces reasoning cost while maintaining or improving task performance.

Pre-trained vision-language models excel across varied perception tasks, but adapting them to novel downstream settings without sacrificing generalization remains non-trivial. Existing parameter-efficient prompt learning method often yields inconsistent representations and fails to account for semantic distribution shifts. In this work, we present DiscoVL, a disentangled cross-modal representation learning framework that couples orthogonal adversarial regularization with structured cross-modal alignment for vision-language models. To address the insufficient cross-modal interaction, our DiscoVL designs a multi-branch low-rank residual aligner that decomposes representations into subspaces and enables bidirectional cross-modal feedback between visual and textual streams at each layer. Furthermore, while conventional triplet constraints overfit features to class centroids, we design an orthogonal regularization for adversarial triplet loss, which prevents centroid collapse and substantially boosts generalization. Evaluations on 15 benchmarks demonstrate that DiscoVL delivers consistent improvements over state-of-the-art methods for base-to-novel generalization, cross-dataset evaluation, and few-shot learning

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) often struggle to identify and use geometric relations in diagrams. Recent methods address this challenge by converting geometric entities, relations, and constraints into explicit textual representations for the model to reason over. However, effective formalization is highly non-trivial: on Geometry3K, structure injection fixes 28 errors but introduces 13 new ones among 200 examples. Redundant relations can distract the model, while ambiguous references to diagram elements can lead it to apply constraints incorrectly. This suggests that the key challenge is not merely extracting more geometric facts, but organizing them into representations that support downstream reasoning. To fully exploit the power of formalization, we further propose GeoReform, a reflective formalization evolution framework that treats formalization as an optimizable policy rather than a fixed parser output. GeoReform executes the full reasoning pipeline, collects failed rollouts, diagnoses defects in the current representation, and mutates the policy to better select, ground, group, and present geometric entities, relations, constraints, and targets. On Geometry3K, GeoReform improves Qwen3VL-2B accuracy from 42.0% to 56.0%. Extensive experiments and analyses across geometry reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that effective formalization is crucial for improving multimodal geometry reasoning.

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) enables large language models (LLMs) to adapt to specialized tasks, but often at the cost of degrading general capabilities acquired during pretraining. Existing approaches primarily mitigate this trade-off through data replay or regularization, relying on additional data or explicit optimization constraints. We instead focus on a different question: where should adaptation be applied? We find that fine-tuning different Transformer layers produces different target-task gains and degrees of capability degradation, suggesting that not all layers are equally suitable for adaptation. To characterize this difference, we use layer-wise empirical Fisher information to measure target-task sensitivity. However, computing Fisher scores requires backward computation and becomes increasingly expensive for large models. We therefore introduce input--output cosine similarity as a lightweight, forward-only proxy for ranking layer sensitivity. Across models and tasks, layers with lower input--output similarity consistently exhibit higher empirical Fisher scores. Building on this observation, we propose Layer-Selective LoRA (LS-LoRA), which places trainable LoRA adapters only in layers with low input--output similarity. Experiments on mathematical reasoning and code generation show that LS-LoRA improves average target-task performance while retaining substantially more commonsense reasoning capability than standard all-layer LoRA, demonstrating that carefully choosing where to adapt can provide a simple and effective way to balance target-task adaptation and general capability retention.

LLM developers post-train their models to exhibit prosocial values and behavioral traits, which are enumerated in an alignment target. However, while recent post-training developments have yielded models that score highly on alignment evaluations, training models on sets of narrow behaviors still influences their behavior across unseen contexts and environments in unexpected ways. In this paper, we establish the task of alignment generalization prediction, i.e., predicting how fine-tuning a model to follow a given value changes its behavior across a wide range of held-out values. We conduct a large-scale analysis of alignment generalization effects across 66 values found in modern alignment targets, and benchmark representational techniques on the alignment generalization prediction task. We find that representations based on model activations when applying values in context significantly outperform methods based on textual descriptions of the values. Specifically, the best activations-based methods achieve correlations of 0.45 with our generalization matrix, compared with 0.05 from description-based baselines. We then show the applicability of representations that predict alignment generalization toward downstream tasks by using them to measure how similar the values in a multi-value alignment target are, which we find is significantly correlated with model robustness. Finally, we show initial evidence towards a shared, model-independent value space, which we use to develop the first taxonomy of LLM values grounded in empirical generalization dynamics. Our work demonstrates the importance of studying value generalization in LLMs and its application toward the more empirical design and training of model behavior.

Understanding large language model (LLM) reasoning requires looking beyond behavioral performance to examine how reasoning ability is reflected in internal organization. Inspired by neuroscience findings linking higher intelligence to stronger small-world organization in functional brain networks, we investigate small-world connectivity as a structural signature of LLM reasoning. We construct functional graphs from attention-head activation similarities and find that a higher small-world index (SWI), capturing local clustering and short global paths, consistently correlates with better fluid reasoning performance across models and training checkpoints. Since local clustering is central to small-world organization, we further examine how heads important for model performance connect within and across communities. We find that these heads tend to have a larger share of connection weight within their own communities (high core scores) and a more concentrated weight distribution across communities (low bridge scores). These observations motivate the hypothesis that high core and low bridge scores serve as structural indicators of head importance for reasoning capability. We validate this hypothesis through pruning, introducing Small-World Allocation (SWA), a hierarchical sparsity allocation method guided by these scores. Across six LLMs, SWA better preserves small-world organization and model performance than competing allocation strategies, reducing WikiText perplexity by up to 20%. Together, these findings identify small-world functional connectivity as a measurable signature of LLM reasoning performance, offering a structural perspective that complements behavioral evaluation.

Spatial coding agents significantly improve spatial reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) by using external tools to generate verified execution traces. However, this paradigm inherently suffers from prohibitive inference-time overhead and external dependencies. In this paper, we explore whether an MLLM can internalize this agentic capability to operate entirely tool-free. We begin with a simple observation: prompting an MLLM with summarized execution traces of a spatial coding agent naturally unlocks the model's internal spatial Chain-of-Thought (CoT). Motivated by this, we introduce SpatialOPSD, an on-policy self-distillation framework that internalizes spatial reasoning into a standalone MLLM by formulating verified agent traces as privileged information. To mitigate privileged-information leakage during distillation, we introduce Repetition-Aware Distillation, which combines repetition masking with unlikelihood regularization. Experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that self-distilling SpatialOPSD achieves higher average accuracy than SFT and GRPO on both spatial and OOD datasets, exhibiting superior performance and generalization.

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning often improves language-model performance by giving models additional computation before answering. However, explicit CoT expresses this computation as a sequence of autoregressively generated tokens. Latent reasoning replaces these tokens with compact continuous states, but most autoregressive latent-reasoning methods retain a left-to-right dependency among latent vectors. We introduce LLoCoT: a looped latent-reasoning framework that replaces left-to-right latent generation with iterative refinement of a compact latent workspace. A shared transformer is reapplied for a small number of refinement iterations, jointly updating the latent slots based on the prompt and the evolving workspace state. Using the refined state, a probabilistic head predicts a distribution from which latent tokens are sampled in parallel and used to condition an autoregressive decoder for answer generation. Training uses continuous representations derived from explicit CoT together with a final-answer prediction loss and likelihood-based supervision of the latent states. Across HumanEval and MBPP, LLoCoT achieves the highest mean among the evaluated methods, performing on par in accuracy with Reasoning SFT, our explicit-CoT baseline, while outperforming the base model, answer-only SFT and NF-CoT. Relative to Reasoning SFT, LLoCoT reduces time to the first answer token by approximately $36\times$ and reasoning-phase latency by approximately $42\times$, while increasing end-to-end throughput by $9.2%$. This design replaces serial thought generation with parallel latent-slot refinement while retaining probabilistic latent modeling and autoregressive answer decoding.

Vision-language models (VLMs) show great potential for damage assessment after a disaster, but a recurring deficiency is that they are reluctant to declare a hazard; that is, recall is low even when overall accuracy appears adequate. This study examines that deficiency by using signal detection theory to decompose the decision behavior into perceptual capability and decision-criterion placement. We then propose a novel method for correcting the over-conservative decision policy, inspired by the finding that fear makes humans risk-averse, and ask whether an affective representation associated with fear can be causally manipulated to similarly alter a VLM's decision tendency. Using mechanistic interpretability, we localize a causally implicated affective circuit in the model and use activation steering to manipulate it while observing the effect on downstream prediction. The method is tested on a two-stage SeisMLLM pipeline built on Qwen2.5-VL-7B-Instruct, which flags only 27.0% of genuinely unsafe buildings on the SeisMLLM-1K test split and never issues a false Red, an SDT criterion of c = +1.354, despite adequate evidence quality (d' = 1.521). An affective direction is localized on emotion-rich natural scenes, causally validated by sparse-neuron knockout and distributed steering on held-out emotion data, and then injected into the building task. Fear-direction injection raises Red recall to 75.7% (p<0.001), and subtracting the same direction suppresses Red predictions entirely, whereas norm-matched random and matched happiness directions show no significant effect. The mechanism is a shift in criterion (c=-1.515) while discrimination is not improved (d'=-0.493). These results show that VLM decisions can be adjusted at inference time without retraining and demonstrate how mechanistic interpretability can be used to diagnose and control VLM decision behaviors in engineering applications.

Scaling laws describe power-law improvements in model performance with dataset size and parameter count, yet their underlying mechanisms are not fully understood. To explain the parameter count scaling, existing theory posits power-law scaling with model depth. In linear-attention models, this scaling is tied to a power-law data spectrum: unable to selectively attend to relevant tokens, these models learn according to global spectral strength, with stronger directions learned before weaker ones. Large language models, however, can be strongly nonlinear. Here, we show that nonlinear attention yields inverse-depth decay of loss across all tested data spectra. Nonlinearity enables attention to focus selectively on relevant tokens, allowing strong and weak spectral directions to be learned in parallel. Similar focusing across layers motivates a connection to the central limit theorem: shared error across layers sets the loss plateau, while aggregation turns layer-specific differences into continued gains with depth. Our findings suggest that depth scaling may arise from nonlinearity in attention, which allows large language models to focus locally and may make the global covariance structure less relevant.

Current frontier LLMs can theoretically process long contexts with 1M tokens or more. But to what extent can they go beyond simple retrieval and perform deeper reasoning over such long contexts? We empirically investigate long-horizon reasoning capabilities of LLMs, focusing on deductive logic expressed in Prolog. We construct ProloNg, a synthetic testbed to probe Prolog Long Reasoning, which systematically varies the complexity (reasoning depth) of problems, where the hardest case has a reasoning depth of 22 and 62k context length. We study 8 reasoning models across 5 families of frontier LLMs, and find that performance degrades substantially as reasoning depth grows, with the majority of models approaching chance beyond depth 10.

Supervised fine-tuning (SFT) equips large language models (LLMs) with specialized capabilities, but often comes at the cost of forgetting the general capabilities of their parent models (i.e., the pretrained models before fine-tuning). This trade-off is especially limiting for queries that require both specialized and general capabilities. We introduce SFT-as-context, a training-free method in which the parent model uses the SFT model's response as context to answer the query. This allows the parent model to acquire fine-tuned capabilities from the SFT response through in-context learning while preserving its own general capabilities. Across 19 parent-SFT model pairs and 11 benchmarks, SFT-as-context remains close to the SFT models on fine-tuned capabilities, with gaps of only 2.2 and 2.1 percentage points on AIME 2024 and LiveCodeBench and 2.0 macro MAE on NutriBench-English, while staying within 2.2 percentage points of the parent models on general capabilities on average. Remarkably, it can solve queries requiring both fine-tuned and general capabilities, even when neither the parent nor SFT model succeeds alone. This approach also extends beyond parent-SFT pairs: responses from a small open-source SFT model can improve a strong closed-source LLM, outperforming either model alone. Furthermore, we use a Bayesian framework to derive theoretical guarantees that bound the error of SFT-as-context relative to the SFT model on fine-tuned capabilities and to the parent model on general capabilities. In addition, we visualize the attention weights and find that the parent model attends more to useful SFT responses and less to irrelevant ones, suggesting that selective attention helps the parent model use the SFT response through in-context learning.

Deploying large language models in production often requires constraining outputs to structured formats such as JSON or XML, and prior work treats the resulting accuracy loss as an inherent `structure tax'. We re-examine this claim by evaluating a battery of models, datasets and schemas, measuring task accuracy, confidence calibration, and hidden-state geometry. The tax turns out to depend on schema design rather than on structure per se: reasoning-first field ordering matches or exceeds free-form accuracy, while answer-first ordering causes steep drops, particularly in smaller models. Format sensitivity scales inversely with a task's own structural constraints, and schemas that preserve reasoning order also improve calibration with CKA showing greater separability between correct and incorrect representations in middle transformer layers. Our findings indicate that properly designed structured formats can match or exceed free-form performance, reframing the critical question from `whether to structure' to `how to structure' for optimal reasoning preservation.

Large language models increasingly justify legal decisions by naming the statute or precedent behind a verdict, treated as evidence that the decision follows from it. We test this directly: holding case facts fixed, we substitute the named legal authority for an unrelated one and decode a model's evolving verdict from its hidden states. Across seven open-weight models (8B-70B) and four benchmarks spanning judicial and contractual reasoning, when explicitly required to justify a verdict by naming the governing authority, models name the correct one in 66.7%-100% of generations, while the verdict changing when the authority changes is far less consistent: 0.0%-21.7% on CaseHOLD, 30.0%-76.7% on ECHR and SCOTUS, and 43.3%-50.0% on ContractNLI. Neither scale nor a purpose-built legal-reasoning model (a best-effort LoRA reproduction; Section 6) closes this gap. A red-teaming evaluation on five core models finds compliance with an adversarial instruction hidden in the case facts (73.3%-96.4%) exceeds verdict-swap sensitivity by a wide margin, holding without exception across model rankings. Naming a legal authority is thus a poor proxy for a verdict's dependence on it, while the same verdict remains separately vulnerable to adversarial manipulation. Both findings replicate across checks ruling out prompt-wording noise and confounded sampling, and bear directly on the use of generated legal explanations as compliance or audit artefacts.

Time Series Language Models (TSLMs) offer a promising path toward time series understanding by reasoning over temporal signals and producing natural language answers and explanations. A common approach is Chain-of-Thought (CoT), which generates step-by-step rationales linking relevant signal patterns to final answers. Although these models learn from reference CoT traces during post-training, generating faithful descriptions of input time series at inference remains challenging. Expressing high-dimensional, continuous temporal representations in discrete language tokens may cause the model to neglect task-relevant patterns or describe them inaccurately. Because later reasoning steps build on these descriptions, early errors propagate, leading to incorrect answers with plausible explanations that are inconsistent with the input signal. We propose Lapras (Latent Post-trained Reasoning Across Series), a post-training framework that equips TSLMs with latent reasoning. A model trained with Lapras reasons through a sequence of continuous thoughts in the joint time series-language space, producing text only for the final answer. It learns this through teacher-student self-distillation, where a teacher trained on CoT reference traces reasons explicitly through text. The student aligns its hidden states with the teacher's at the answer stage, transferring the teacher's reasoning ability into its latent computation. We evaluate Lapras across four TSLM backbones on five time series question answering benchmarks. Lapras improves average F1 by up to 10.79% over explicit CoT while generating 23.9x fewer tokens. Lapras's continuous thoughts can also be decoded into readable reasoning traces via standard language decoding, preserving textual explanations. Together, these results highlight Lapras as a promising post-training paradigm for efficient, effective, and interpretable TSLM reasoning.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in sociotechnical systems where social attribution, the reasoning process attributing external events to the causes and reasons of agents' social behaviors, plays a critical role. These processes involve judgments of social cause, responsibility, and blame/credit to agents. Although attributional models are well-studied in social psychology and cognition through Attribution Theory, social attribution remains underexplored in AI, particularly LLM social reasoning. This paper provides the first systematic exploration of LLM social attribution. Our work focuses on responsibility and blame attributions, examining current LLMs' judgments and their underlying internal mechanisms. Guided by attribution theory, we construct a social attribution benchmark consisting of a Vignette subset based on classic scenarios from attribution theory research and a Reality subset based on real-world social narratives, yielding 7,639 responsibility/blame judgment questions. On this basis, we evaluate 32 representative LLMs and 5 basic non-LLM baselines. To further explore the internal mechanisms underlying the LLM judgment process, we develop a probing-based methodology to investigate the latent-space representations of 5 key attribution dimensions and the consistency of their influences on LLM judgments compared to those in human social attribution. Our research findings reveal that current LLMs exhibit measurable but incomplete agreement with human responsibility and blame judgments, and meanwhile, this agreement is positively correlated with model size. Some attribution dimensions are systematically decodable from specific positions in LLM hidden states, and their influences on the final judgment are consistent with those indicated by human Attribution Theory. The dataset and associated code are available at https://github.com/Yuzhaoxin946/SAB-Bench.

We introduce Conversational Voice Aesthetic Model, a speech large language model for describing the voice aesthetics of real or synthetic speech responses in natural conversational contexts. Given a context and a response speech, CVAM describes salient moments that characterize the voice and predicts nine categorical attributes spanning gender, pitch, pacing, emotion, and delivery. The key challenge lies in perceptual fields such as emotion and delivery, which are inherently subjective and lack definitive ground truth. Therefore, we collect ~10 human annotations for each of 3k real and synthetic responses derived from the CANDOR corpus. CVAM is supervised finetuned on synthesized aesthetic descriptions and labels, then optimized with Group Relative Policy Optimization on human judgments. Experiments show that CVAM better agrees with human listeners than Gemini 3.1 Pro and open-source speech LLMs, and outperforms single-human-vs.-rest agreement. Together, we demonstrate the importance of grounding voice aesthetics in human perception and propose a principled framework for human alignment.

Vision-Language (VL) reasoning requires a model to both extract relevant and accurate information from an image (visual reasoning, VR), and to infer the answer from it (language reasoning, LR). Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards typically trains both through a single chain-of-thought with a final-answer reward. This gives every CoT token the same sequence-level advantage, failing to distinguish capability specific errors. We propose SPLIT-RL, a staged post-training approach that trains VR and LR in disjoint phases. Because a group's rollouts differ along one capability at a time, the group-relative advantage isolates it, and each phase is optimized using phase-specific reward. We further introduce Claim-Level Advantage (CLA-GRPO), which decomposes VR-phase rollouts into atomic visual claims and provides a fine-grained advantage at claim level based on visual-type group formation. Although trained in two phases, trained policy is evaluated like GRPO model, with a single CoT call at inference time. Under this protocol, SPLIT-RL improves average accuracy over GRPO by 1.4-6.1 points across Qwen3-VL models from 2B to 30B-A3B and InternVL3.5-8B. Evaluating each capability using an oracle based diagnostic shows that answer-only GRPO leaves perception unchanged, whereas SPLIT-RL improves both VR and LR.

In subliminal learning (SL), a teacher model passes on a trait to a student model by distillation on data semantically unrelated to the trait. So far, SL has been demonstrated for only a limited range of traits, including preferences for animals (e.g., owls) and malicious personas. These traits can also be elicited with simple prompts or with steering. Can SL transfer a wider range of traits, including more complex ones? If so, distillation might transfer subtle forms of misalignment (e.g., reward-seeking, scheming, and secret loyalties) without detection. To this end, we test whether SL can transfer a novel capability: predicting the outputs of a randomly initialized MLP. After distilling on unrelated text, the student achieves substantial performance on the task, while falling short of the teacher. We find that a directly optimized steering vector matches SL in distribution but generalizes worse out of distribution. Next, we test whether SL can transfer backdoors. We finetune the teacher to answer in French when the prompt contains a female name, then distill on number sequences containing neither names nor French. The student partially acquires the backdoor, responding in French on 23.5% of prompts with female names versus 0.0% with male names. Finally, we test whether SL can transfer a propensity to hack in an agentic chess environment. We finetune the student on number sequences from a steered hacker teacher. The student hacks in 58.3% of episodes, compared with 10.9% for the unfinetuned model. Thus, we show SL can transfer capabilities, backdoors, and hacking propensities. The amount of transfer is sensitive to the setup. In several experiments, it is made stronger by using logit distillation or by restricting LoRA to the attention layers.

Looped Language Models (LoopLMs) offer a parameter efficient approach to scaling reasoning by reusing shared parameters across recurrent computation steps. Despite their promise, effective post-training of LoopLMs remains challenging. Existing approaches either provide reward based supervision that is sparse or costly to extend across loops, or rely on external teachers or privileged information, leading to limited teacher availability or teacher-student context mismatch. To address these limitations, we introduce LoopOPD, a cross-loop on-policy distillation framework that uses additional recurrent computation within a LoopLM as its own source of supervision. LoopOPD uses a frozen terminal loop policy as a compute privileged teacher for an intermediate loop student on student generated rollouts, providing dense supervision without an external teacher or privileged information. We further propose Dynamic LoopOPD (D-LoopOPD), which continually refreshes the terminal loop teacher as the shared model parameters are updated, enabling recurrent self-improvement. We characterize how distillation updates propagate across loop depths and derive sufficient conditions under which a single update yields simultaneous local improvement at both loop depths. Experiments on Ouro-Thinking models show that LoopOPD improves mathematical reasoning, while D-LoopOPD yields further gains through dynamic teacher updates. Despite being trained only on mathematical data, the resulting models also improve on general reasoning and code generation benchmarks, demonstrating that recurrent computation can serve as an effective source of supervision for LoopLMs. Our code and model checkpoints will be released upon acceptance.

Knowledge distillation is an established technique for improving the capabilities of small, efficient student models by training them with the representations of larger, more capable teacher models. Much of the recent work in the distillation of large language models (LLMs) has focused on distilling abilities learned during post-training, such as instruction following, chain-of-thought reasoning, and tool usage. This has left a large research gap in general knowledge distillation for LLMs, which is essential for developing efficient and private systems suitable for deployment on edge devices. We take a first-principles approach, evaluating previous lessons from prior works and conducting new explorations to develop a distillation methodology suitable for modern LLMs. We present KDFP, a novel methodology for white-box general knowledge distillation in LLMs. We demonstrate that KDFP outperforms existing methods by 1.6% $-$ 4.9% across 9 benchmarks while increasing training efficiency by up to 99.1% through ephemeral parameter reduction.

Researchers are exploring effective one-step generative model continuously, and, Drifting Models (Deng et al., 2026), demonstrate great potential in one-step generation recently. There are works that reveal the connection between Diffusion & Flow Style Generative Models (DFSGMs) (Ho et al., 2020; Song et al., 2020a;b; Lipman et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2022) and Drifting Models (Li & Zhu, 2026; Lai et al., 2026; Turan et al., 2026). But no one has yet established a precise correspondence between the Drifting Model and the widely used distillation method- Distribution Matching Distillation (DMD/DMD2) (Yin et al., 2024b;a) to the best of our knowledge, even though their optimization objective formulas are virtually identical. In this paper, we prove that by converting the velocity-field / noise-field from the pre-trained DFSGMs into the attraction force field in Drifting Models and estimating the repulsion force field from the generative distribution, training the Drifting Model is naturally equivalent to the Distribution Matching Distillation. With this equivalent concept, we propose an improved method based on DMD from the Drifting Model's perspective- Multi-Bandwidth Distribution Matching Distillation (MBDMD).