每天知道
你的领域
出了什么

Text-to-music language models begin with a choice usually made by default: how to tokenize music. Normally entangled with backbone, data, and recipe, its effect has never been measured in isolation. We fix pretrained Qwen3.5 (0.8B-27B), data, budget, and decoding, and swap only the representation across seven tokenizations, anchoring texture metrics to each representation's model-free ceiling. The ordering is clean and surprising: representation, not model size, is the binding variable for distributional fidelity. Scaling the backbone 34x barely moves Frechet Music Distance (FMD), whereas switching representation halves it. PMT, a performance-resolution stream we release (10 ms timing, per-note velocity, multi-track texture; 609 symbols), reaches FMD 159 at 0.8B against 272-286 for beat grids (1.7-1.8x lower, up to 2.8x elsewhere; non-overlapping bootstrap CIs), so a 0.8B performance-resolution model beats a 27B beat grid. It reappears on a 26M from-scratch backbone and a second performance-resolution tokenizer: a property of the class, not one lucky vocabulary. Nor is it a finer-lattice artifact: snapping PMT's onsets to the beat grids' resolution still leaves it 67-129 FMD ahead of both (n=500). The effect is distributional; whether it is audible is a separate question, left open by our probe, with a human study pre-registered. Native caption adherence is weak but separable: a lightweight decode-time constraint doubles instrument-F1 (.28 to .60) and Correct-Key (.16 to .35) at no distributional cost. We release the harness, 25+ checkpoints, two corpora (86.6k aligned across caption/MIDI/ABC/audio; 6.25M captioned, the largest for music), and an imprinting diagnostic: published text-to-MIDI systems reproduce their training distribution near-invariant to the caption (72% vs. 71% chord-time on disjoint domains). The field's next representation claim can now be measured, not asserted.

Existing scaling strategies for Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) typically expand either model parameters or sequential inference computation, incurring substantial memory or latency overhead. More importantly, most existing methods fail to alter the rigid, fixed computation allocation between the Vision Transformer and the Large Language Model components, limiting task-specific optimization. To address this, we introduce the Parallel Vision-Language (ParVL) scaling framework for MLLMs, which scales parallel computation by reusing the existing ViT and LLM backbone parameters across multiple vision and language branches. This framework raises a central question: given a fixed backbone parameter budget, how should additional shared-backbone computation be allocated between the vision and language modalities? We instantiate each parallel computational stream with branch-specific prefix parameters over a shared backbone, and train the entire model end-to-end via full-parameter supervised fine-tuning on roughly 13B tokens. We systematically study the computation-allocation trade-off between the ViT encoder and LLM decoder. ParVL improves overall multimodal performance over same-recipe single-branch baselines, and the best evaluated vision--language allocation varies across tasks. Code is available at https://github.com/YangYangGirl/ParVL.

Vocabulary extension is an efficient way to adapt pretrained large language models (LLMs) to new languages, but the initialization of newly added token embeddings can strongly affect continued pre-training (CPT) efficiency. We present a systematic study of more than 20 initialization strategies for Hindi vocabulary extension in Nemotron-3-Nano-30B-A3B. Our comparison spans vocabulary-averaging baselines; external and learned initialization methods, including FOCUS, top-k semantic retrieval, and residual MLP mappings; subword composition; norm calibration; and input-output asymmetry. We find that subword composition methods outperform both vocabulary averaging and external/learned initialization approaches. Within subword composition, asymmetric variants achieve the lowest observed early validation loss and reveal distinct preferences for input and output embedding initialization. The best observed configuration initializes the input embedding matrix with uniform subword averaging and Hindi-specific norm calibration, and the output language modeling head with character-length-weighted subword averaging. Relative to the standard Mean-all baseline, this full initialization pipeline reaches comparable validation loss with over a 6x reduction in CPT steps and exceeds the baseline's 3,500-step MILU-Hindi accuracy after only 500 steps. Finally, we show that initialization loss and initialization bits-per-byte (Init BPB) are unreliable predictors of downstream convergence, whereas lightweight CPT, as few as 50 steps, provides a cost-effective and reliable signal for selecting the best initialization strategy.

Localizing concurrent bugs from bug reports alone is challenging due to incomplete information, misleading program-entity mentions, and complex cross-thread interactions, causing existing LLM-based approaches to suffer from unstable reasoning and limited explainability. We propose ConFL, an explainable concurrent fault localization framework that augments LLM reasoning with structured concurrency knowledge. ConFL constructs a Concurrent Knowledge Base (CKB) from source code and performs LLM-guided hierarchical retrieval to progressively narrow the search space from components to interaction-level concurrency contexts. An interaction-level DSL explicitly encodes cross-thread interactions over shared resources, enabling focused reasoning without traversing deep call chains. Experiments on real-world concurrent bugs from eight large-scale Java projects show that ConFL significantly outperforms state-of-the-art IR-based and LLM-based baselines, achieving an MRR of 0.503 and a MAP of 0.486, while remaining robust to noisy bug reports, unseen bugs, and different LLM backbones.

Video large language models (VideoLLMs) achieve strong video understanding performance, but their inference remains expensive due to the large number of redundant spatio-temporal visual tokens in long videos. Existing token pruning methods alleviate this cost by reducing redundant tokens, yet most of them rely on segment-level local pruning, where videos are partitioned into isolated segments and tokens are selected independently within each segment. Such designs may under-preserve short but semantically dense segments and discard tokens that appear non-salient locally but remain critical from a global perspective. To address this issue, we propose GSTEP (Global Spatio-Temporal Density Pruning), a plug-and-play pruning framework that models video as a continuous spatio-temporal information flow. GSTEP constructs a token-level spatio-temporal density by combining a continuous temporal density, obtained from a smoothed centered frame-level change signal, with intra-frame spatial density, and then performs global token sampling by jointly balancing information density and coverage. Extensive experiments on multiple VideoLLMs and public benchmarks demonstrate that GSTEP consistently achieves strong accuracy-efficiency trade-offs and generalizes well across model architectures and evaluation settings. On LLaVA-OneVision-7B, GSTEP prunes 75% of visual tokens, preserves up to 100.2% of the original average performance across benchmarks, and achieves a 1.17 end-to-end speedup.

When asked which of two events came first, video large language models can fail in two opposite ways: cave to a false claim, or reject a true one. Prior video sycophancy work measures only the first and mitigates it by teaching the model to trust the user less, a fix known in text and image models to worsen the second. In video, both failures come from two causes the literature treats as one: availability, whether the sparse sampled frames contain the two events, and weighting, whether that evidence is trusted over the user. We separate them with two interventions that keep the claim fixed: a frame-preserving reorder that flips the claim's truth, and a sampling-offset shift that captures or misses both events at a fixed frame budget. When the events are missed, the two twins present identical frames, so each of the nine models we evaluate accepts a true and a false claim at the same rate, making Youden's $J=0$ by construction. Availability is necessary but not sufficient. Five of the nine read the order, yet four of those five still cave to the false claim, so their deference hits a weighting ceiling. Since trust cannot be calibrated over evidence that was never sampled, we propose a reversal test that cancels the model's order prior by scoring the sampled frames forward and reversed, then answers, resamples, or abstains without reading the claim. The test raises the order accuracy to 0.92-1.00 on the models that read the order and abstains rather than guesses on those that cannot.

Parameter-efficient fine-tuning (PEFT) enables efficient adaptation of large language models, but existing MoE-based PEFT methods typically improve capacity by storing multiple full LoRA experts, causing adapter storage to grow linearly with the number of experts and restricting adaptation to a fixed expert pool. We ask whether MoE-based PEFT can produce instance-specific adaptations without explicitly storing a separate LoRA module for each expert. To address this gap, we propose MoEGen, an adaptation framework that shifts MoE-based PEFT from expert selection to expert-conditioned parameter generation. Instead of storing each expert as a full LoRA adapter, MoEGen represents each expert as a small learnable vector, termed an expert code. It routes each input over these vectors and uses their weighted combination to condition a lightweight hypernetwork that generates input-specific low-rank updates. This design decouples expert capacity from adapter storage while enabling instance-conditioned adaptation. Experiments on eight commonsense reasoning benchmarks show consistent improvements over strong static and MoE-based PEFT baselines across three backbones. MoEGen also performs strongly in joint medical and legal-domain adaptation.

Abductive reasoning requires forming hypotheses that explain observed evidence and revising them as new evidence becomes available. While large language models (LLMs) are often evaluated on whether they solve abductive reasoning tasks correctly, less is known about how they acquire evidence, update their hypotheses, and decide when to stop. We introduce Alien Abduction game, an interactive probe for studying these behaviours under different interaction modes. The modes vary in whether evidence is provided upfront or across turns, and whether queries are selected by the model or examples are provided by the oracle. Across models, providing evidence upfront leads to higher success rates than distributing it across turns. In multi-turn settings, some models commit before using the available evidence, while others exhaust the turn budget without converging. Models also achieve higher success rates when examples are provided by the oracle than when they select their own queries, although their final hypotheses are more consistent with the evidence they selected. These findings suggest that models may form hypotheses that fit self-selected evidence without sufficiently distinguishing them from alternatives, and may struggle to validate and refine their hypotheses or determine when to stop.

Federated fine-tuning with Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) enables efficient collaborative adaptation of Large Language Models (LLMs) without centralizing private data. However, LoRA's two-factor parameterization creates an aggregation mismatch across clients: naively averaging the factors does not recover the average of their induced updates. This mismatch can be avoided by forming the exact aggregate in the full weight space and then recompressing it, but decomposing the resulting dense matrix is computationally expensive and memory-intensive. We propose FraQ, an efficient coordinate-space recompression method for federated LoRA. Starting from stacked factors that exactly represent the aggregate, FraQ factorizes it into an orthonormal basis and a compact coordinate matrix. It then recovers the singular spectrum from a small Gram matrix, selects the smallest rank satisfying a prescribed energy threshold, and maps the selected coordinate subspace back through the basis to construct the global adapter. Experiments on text classification and commonsense reasoning benchmarks show that FraQ achieves accuracy close to uncompressed baselines while substantially reducing downlink communication with low server-side recompression overhead.

Memory-augmented LLM agents rely on rich context for long-horizon reasoning and acting, yet their memory modules expose a persistent attack surface for malicious records, making the study of memory poisoning threats imperative. However, existing query-only attacks often fail to remain effective in two realistic and prevalent settings: large-scale benign memory pools and active input auditing. Consequently, current approaches fall short when facing the dual challenges of high retrieval competitiveness and rigorous semantic checks. To overcome these limitations, we propose MAFIA, a query-only Memory Attack framework via probing and Factual Injection against Audit, tailored to this extended threat model. Specifically, MAFIA introduces: (1) a placement strategy that ensures retrieval-competitive injection via memory probing, budget allocation, and scheduling; and (2) a payload design that bypasses audits using compact factual cloaks, preserving malicious effects while maintaining high semantic similarity. Extensive evaluations reveal that MAFIA achieves up to a 90.7% attack success rate while suppressing audit detection from a peak of 83.3% to at most 7.4%, exposing critical vulnerabilities across agentic memory systems. Code will be made publicly available at https://github.com/JiamingChen1234/MAFIA.

Fine-tuning a large language model on new data degrades what it previously learned. We present Omega-S, a drop-in penalty computed from the weight matrix alone: it needs no previous-task data, no Fisher matrix and no stored copy of the old weights. It is three lines in an existing training loop and adds under 4% to the cost of a step. Retention. On Llama-3-8B with LoRA, fine-tuned from code to prose and measured by HumanEval over ten seeds, Omega-S retains more of the original capability than no regularisation on 9 of 10 seeds (0.173 -> 0.238 absolute pass@1; sign test one-sided p=0.011, Wilcoxon p=0.006), as a retention ratio, 62.9% -> 84.1%. It also beats tuned weight decay on 10 of 10 seeds (p=0.002) and tuned EWC on 8 of 10 (p=0.014), every arm re-measured in the same session. Mechanism, measured rather than asserted. Omega-S is topological by construction, its objective built from Tr(A^3), but we measured which of its four factors actually moves and three do not: their elasticity with respect to the weights is at or below 1e-4, against 9e-3 for the degree-variance term. As implemented, the composite reduces to a penalty on the variance of node degrees, which means row magnitude in square modules and directional alignment in non-square ones. We report this because a method whose name promises one thing and whose gradient does another should say so. We also enumerate the open design choices, including a contrast-preserving construction that does what it was designed to do and makes retention worse on all ten seeds. Repeating an identical configuration, same seed and same hardware, gives a standard deviation of 0.104 in retention ratio. We have not found this quantified for low-rank fine-tuning of language models, and it bounds every seed-paired comparison in this literature, ours included. Code, per-seed results and the full record of negative results are available.

We present Semantic Bundling, a visual analytics technique for making sense of text documents represented as knowledge graphs (KGs). Representing a document corpus as a KG makes relationships between entities explicit, making KGs useful both to analyze directly and in computational workflows including ML pipelines and generative AI backends. However, as KGs grow they become difficult to interpret and visualize for specific tasks (e.g., the ``hairball problem''), with the meaning of each relationship often buried in dense source text. Semantic Bundling uses large language models (LLMs) to support user-driven bundling of nodes and edges in a KG into higher-level graph structures: super nodes, which collapse and summarize a region of the graph, and super edges, which summarize the connection between two entities. Results are linked to underlying triples and source documents, grounding summaries in evidence. We implement Semantic Bundling in AgentK, an open-source system that builds a KG from text documents and maps graph interactions to bundling operations. Through use cases on movie reviews and an intelligence analysis scenario, we show how Semantic Bundling reveals new insights in document collections, and synthesize our findings into a discussion of emerging challenges and opportunities in knowledge graph sensemaking.

Vision Transformers (ViTs) and their hierarchical variants have achieved strong performance in Computational Pathology (CPath). However, most are pre-trained on single-resolution Whole Slide Images (WSIs), limiting their generalization across arbitrary resolutions. Gigapixel WSIs inherently contain diagnostic patterns at multiple scales, including cellular morphologies, tissue architectures, and global context, mirroring how expert pathologists examine WSIs. We introduce Multi-Resolution Pyramid Transformer (MRPT), a model that hierarchically aggregates multi-resolution information from cellular to tissue and WSI levels. MRPT employs a biologically meaningful Consecutive Cross-Resolution Attention (CCRA) mechanism to capture scale-independent interactions and enforces multi-resolution semantic consistency by aligning embeddings across resolutions, yielding robust and generalizable WSI representations. Pre-trained in a multi-resolution self-supervised manner on 624M patches, 2.4M regions, and 36K WSIs, MRPT learns rich coarse-to-fine histopathology features. Extensive experiments on 34 diverse datasets show that MRPT surpasses recent foundation models and Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in cancer subtype classification, tissue phenotyping, and Visual Question Answering (VQA) for WSI understanding.

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable performance across vision-language tasks, but their progress depends heavily on large-scale, high-quality multimodal data that are costly to annotate. Self-augmentation offers a promising alternative by enabling models to expand their own training data without external supervision. However, existing MLLM self-augmentation methods are largely text-centric, while image augmentation remains underexplored and typically relies on generic or handcrafted transformations that are weakly aligned with the model's actual incapability. We propose Failure-informed Image Self-Augmentation (FISA), a framework for MLLM self-improvement that constructs augmented images from the model's own failure cases. Our method generates visually challenging yet answer-preserving image complications, verifies their utility through self-examination, and applies dual fidelity filtering to avoid semantic distortion. Experiments on visual question answering benchmarks show that the proposed method consistently improves performance across both in-distribution and out-of-distribution settings. Further experiments validate the compatibility of FISA with existing textual self-augmentation approaches, the superior data efficiency of the synthesized samples over generic image augmentation baselines, and the practical effectiveness of the proposed filtering strategy.

Prior work has shown that LLMs encode the truth of factual propositions along linear directions in activation space. It's unclear how these representations extend to contextual truth: propositions whose truth is determined by in-context evidence rather than world knowledge. We show that LLMs maintain a linear representation of contextual truth that persists across structurally different output policies, even when the output doesn't require the model to determine a proposition's truth, and show causal evidence via steering experiments. Using the transcripts from a collaborative vision-language task that requires two LLMs to maintain a shared common ground, we show that truth representations of a proposition are significantly swayed by partner assertions about that proposition, even when the LLM has enough evidence to determine its truth. We find evidence that propositions near the decision boundary are more susceptible to having their truth shifted through partner assertions. Separating representation from output distinguish two forms of sycophancy that output behavior alone cannot: the model may accommodate a false proposition while continuing to represent it as false, or shift its representation across the boundary. The latter is 2.59x more common when the model agrees by restating the false claim explicitly than when it agrees implicitly.

Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting remains the standard baseline for evaluating models' reasoning abilities. Originally, this technique was introduced to elicit step-by-step reasoning from large language models (LLMs), which would otherwise tend to directly output the final answer. However, many modern LLMs produce CoT-style responses natively when presented with reasoning tasks, which made us revisit the effectiveness of standard CoT prompting. We evaluate several modern mid-sized language models on a math problem-solving task and find that models specialized for reasoning achieve better performance in a simple zero-shot setting than when using few-shot CoT examples - significantly surpassing officially reported results at no additional cost (e.g., from $\sim$77% to $\sim$84% for Mathstral on GSM8K). For the tested general-purpose model, a zero-shot CoT prompt is also sufficient to outperform a few-shot CoT baseline. We attribute this to a `guidance-distraction' tradeoff: standard CoT prompting also demands style adaptation, formatting compliance, and potentially undesired contextualization, which can distract models from the core reasoning task. Our findings suggest that using standard CoT prompting increasingly acts as a source of distraction as models grow stronger.

This paper offers a new interpretation of the Transformer during inference. Against the "stochastic parrot" view that large language models merely reproduce statistical regularities learned in training, we argue that Transformers construct and apply prompt-dependent transformations whose parameters are generated during inference. We call this form of computation SIDPP: Sequence-level Interactive Dynamic Parallel Processing. The Transformer is interpreted as a system that transforms concepts by means of concepts. Token vectors are the concepts to be transformed; parameterized transformations defined by matrices and vectors are the transforming concepts. These may be static, when fixed through training, or dynamic, when generated from the input sequence. Mechanically, they correspond to groups of simple neural networks. The Transformer's architectural novelty lies in output-weight interconnections, through which the outputs of some networks determine the weights of others, alongside ordinary output-input interconnections. By means of these interconnections, the system constructs transformations from the prompt and uses them to modify token representations. The contribution of dynamic processing grows with prompt length and may equal or exceed that of static processing, a phenomenon we call strong prompt sensitivity. This account bears on interpretability, predictability, control, and the design of smaller, more sustainable systems. Finally, since the human neural system possesses the mechanisms required to implement SIDPP, we argue that a form of SIDPP may, in principle, be neurally realized in the cerebral cortex. We therefore conjecture that human language processing may itself be a form of SIDPP produced by a functional architecture relevantly similar to that of the Transformer.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable potential for analogy making, a core cognitive capability that drives novelty and creativity. While prior research has extensively investigated the applications and underlying mechanisms of LLM-based analogy making, its output diversity remains largely unexplored, despite being essential for broadening cross-domain connections and fostering scientific innovation. In this work, we present a comprehensive evaluation of analogy diversity across ten state-of-the-art open- and closed-source LLMs. Our findings highlight a concerning issue of domain homogeneity, a prevalent tendency for LLMs to generate analogies from a narrow set of target domains, limiting both inter-query and intra-model diversity. Furthermore, our analysis reveals a fundamental trade-off in existing LLM diversity-enhancement methods: increasing output diversity often comes at the expense of output quality. Finally, our causal analysis of LLM information flow reveals substantial differences in the model-sensitive regions governing analogy diversity across LLMs, suggesting a potential mechanism for the observed diversity-quality trade-off. To our knowledge, this is among the first studies to systematically investigate output diversity in LLM-based analogy making.

Partial differential equations (PDEs) become actionable in science and engineering not as isolated formulae, but as executable workflows that connect modelling assumptions, governing equations, numerical solvers, diagnostics, and decisions. Large language models (LLMs) are beginning to support such workflows by linking natural language, symbolic mathematics, code, solver outputs, and feedback. Here we examine recent advances in LLM-assisted PDE research across three stages: the discovery and formulation of governing models, the generation and revision of executable numerical solvers, and the use of simulation feedback to support control, design, and optimization. Across these stages, current systems act primarily as workflow-level interfaces. Despite this progress, the field remains limited by the scarcity of high-quality datasets and benchmarks, especially for knowledge discovery and real-world applications, where expert annotation, executable problem construction, and task-level feedback require substantial domain effort. A further challenge is the persistent gap between simulation-based results and real-world scientific and engineering systems, which limits the direct transfer of numerical simulations, control policies, and optimized designs to practical settings. These challenges make LLM-assisted PDE workflows a critical testbed for developing scientific AI systems that can connect language, computation, physical constraints, and real-world decision-making.

Differentially private zeroth-order optimization (DP-ZO) enables memory-efficient private fine-tuning of large language models using only forward evaluations. Existing aggregation-based DP-ZO methods reconstruct model updates at a fixed scale, ignoring that the strength of useful signals varies throughout training. Consequently, noise-dominated updates may receive excessive weight and degrade model utility. To address this issue, we propose SAGE, a noise-aware shrinkage method that adaptively attenuates privatized estimates according to their estimated signal quality. SAGE subtracts the known Gaussian noise variance from the observed second moment to estimate the underlying signal energy, stabilizes this estimate through temporal tracking, and compares its current signal-to-noise level with a warm-up reference to derive a bounded shrinkage factor. As pure post-processing, SAGE requires neither additional privacy budget nor model queries and introduces only constant additional state. Our theoretical analysis shows that shrinkage reduces the quadratic update-risk term faster than the linear descent term, preserving useful descent while limiting the influence of noise-dominated updates. Experiments on RoBERTa-large, OPT-1.3B, and OPT-6.7B demonstrate that SAGE outperforms existing baselines in most settings under the same privacy budgets while preserving the forward-only memory efficiency of DP-ZO.

Chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning improves large language model (LLM) performance while also providing an observable interface to the model's reasoning process. Existing approaches that leverage verbalized CoTs to monitor reasoning correctness, however, largely evaluate the semantic correctness or consistency of individual intermediate steps, rather than how the reasoning process evolves across the trace. As a result, failures distributed across the reasoning trajectory, rather than those localized to a single incorrect step, remain comparatively underexplored. Furthermore, verbalized CoTs need not faithfully reflect the model's internal reasoning, motivating analyses that do not treat individual statements as literal accounts of internal computation. In this work, we therefore ask whether the dynamics of visible CoT can be leveraged to systematically distinguish successful from failed reasoning without assuming such semantic faithfulness. We study a range of LLMs on verifiable Boolean satisfiability tasks with variable complexity, enabling controlled comparisons near each model's capability frontier. Tagging CoT sentences by reasoning function reveals premature verification collapse on SAT problems: incorrect traces enter clause checking earlier, repeat similar operations, and finalize sooner. On UNSAT problems, models presumptuously move towards incorrect SAT conclusions, checking candidate assignments rather than deriving contradictions across constructed cases. Subsequently, a targeted proof-search prompt intervention raises Llama3-70B accuracy from 13.3% to 85%, correcting 84.6% of these errors. These results show that capability failures can manifest as distributed, task-dependent changes in the structure of visible reasoning, and that CoT dynamics agnostic to whether the verbalized trace reflects the model's internal computations can help diagnose and correct failures.

Large language models often reason at length before answering, increasing cost and latency. Prompts and trained settings can shorten this reasoning, but a shorter trace may only show that the model stopped sooner. Here, we evaluate paired runs of the same question at matched reasoning horizons across 198 GPQA Diamond and 500 MMLU-Pro questions. We test a numeric/concision prompt that announces a token limit for Qwen3-14B and the trained effort settings of gpt-oss-20b and -120b. The Qwen prompt shortens reasoning traces by 12-17%, while accuracy changes at matched token limits are small and mixed. A concise/early-answer instruction raises MMLU-Pro accuracy by 3.8 percentage points at 512 tokens, including +2.7 points when both runs are unfinished. Its gain at 2,048 tokens is uncertain. For gpt-oss, candidate-logit answers from completed low- and medium-effort reasoning are 14.5-26.3 points more accurate than matched-horizon high-effort answers. Most of the 512-token advantage comes from lower effort finishing earlier, while differences among unfinished runs are smaller and mixed. Wrong early answers often concentrate probability on the chosen option, so earlier stopping does not uniformly improve probability quality. In these tests, a tight deadline can favor lower effort or a concise instruction, whereas allowing high effort to finish can recover higher final accuracy. Evaluations should report correct completion before a deadline, the answer obtained when a run is stopped, differences among unfinished runs, and probability assigned to the correct answer separately.

Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) requires both fine-grained visual perception and rigorous logical deduction. Explicit text-based Chain-of-Thought (CoT) is computationally expensive and prone to visual hallucinations, while existing latent reasoning methods typically require costly training. Furthermore, directly adapting training-free LLM reasoning mechanisms to the multimodal setting yields unstable performance. We identify that this failure stems from their reliance on token-level entropy, which fundamentally conflates perceptual ambiguity (e.g., unclear visual details) with logical uncertainty (e.g., complex reasoning steps). To overcome this bottleneck, we present a novel training-free inference strategy for MLLMs that explicitly decouples perception and reasoning. We propose a novel metric, the vision-to-text attention ratio, to dynamically gauge the model's cognitive focus. Guided by this metric, our proposed framework, Attention-Guided Switching (AGS), adaptively triggers latent reasoning for perceptual tokens to preserve high-fidelity visual information in the continuous space, while enforcing explicit text generation for logical tokens to maintain structural anchoring. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance, significantly improving both accuracy and inference efficiency by reducing autoregressive steps and latency. Code is released at https://github.com/swordAndSnow/MM26-AGS.

Diffusion language models (dLLMs) offer an alternative to autoregressive (AR) language modeling, yet the scaling behavior of Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) dLLMs remains poorly understood. We systematically characterize how optimization hyperparameters, compute allocation, and architecture scale for MoE dLLMs, identifying quantitative differences from scaling trends previously reported for AR models. Specifically, for optimization, the optimal nominal batch size grows faster, while the optimal learning rate decays more rapidly with compute. For model--data allocation, IsoFLOP analysis reveals a slight data-side tilt: the optimal token budget grows faster than activated model-side computation. For MoE architecture, larger scales increasingly favor larger expert pools at fixed activated capacity, while moderate expert granularity remains consistently effective and the preferred fraction of activated capacity assigned to shared experts remains stable across scales. Guided by these findings, we train LLaDA MoE v2, a 30B-A3B dLLM, from scratch on 23.5T tokens. With approximately 65% as many pretraining tokens as Qwen3, LLaDA MoE v2 approaches Qwen3 on several knowledge, reasoning, and coding benchmarks. After supervised fine-tuning alone, it outperforms SDAR Chat on seven of eight reasoning and coding benchmarks and remains close to Qwen3 on several tasks. These results establish practical scaling laws and design principles for MoE dLLMs.

Large language models can solve substantially harder reasoning problems with more inference-time compute. The term "test-time scaling," however, now covers diverse inference algorithms that extend deliberation along a single trajectory, sample completed candidates and aggregate them through voting or verification, or search over unfinished partial states. These algorithms differ in their statistical structure, compute accounting, and failure modes. Treating these procedures as interchangeable under a single scalar "budget," or reporting accuracy without the inference protocol that produced it, makes results difficult to compare across studies. We develop a systematic account of test-time scaling along three axes. First, we formalize test-time scaling as budgeted inference over the implicit prefix tree of an autoregressive model and distinguish three structural regimes: single-trajectory sequential scaling, leaf-level scaling with terminal reduction, and prefix-level scaling. Second, we treat the evaluated object as the entire inference system and develop evaluation principles that separate end-to-end system performance from candidate-bank diagnostics. We introduce an evaluation profile whose coordinates and simple functionals recover or bound common repeated-sampling metrics, and prescribe protocol-matched reporting of compute and uncertainty. Third, we specify reproducibility requirements for inference protocols, distinguishing exact replay from distributional reproducibility and identifying the artifacts needed to support each. We also organize the open-weight reasoning ecosystem by model-side and interface mechanisms, apply these principles to broad-knowledge, symbolic-reasoning, and competition-mathematics benchmarks, and assemble over 2 billion full reasoning traces for release with progressively richer verifier and token-level signals.

Large language models have improved substantially on single-shot reasoning tasks, but their performance in sequential decision-making is less well understood. We study this on fully-observable two-player zero-sum games, which provide ground-truth evaluation: outcomes are determined by the rules, and optimality of individual moves can be computed or approximated, without relying on a judge model. Across model tiers, LLMs play suboptimally in simple games such as tic-tac-toe or Connect Four, and lose to MCTS opponents. Obfuscations that preserve the game tree but rewrite its surface form leave performance largely unchanged, indicating the gap is not fully explained by recall of memorized strategies. Motivated by this performance gap, we introduce an agentic framework enhanced with an experience memory designed for the sequential setting and addressing common challenges of sequential decision-making such as credit assignment. We show that post-game reflection and rule extraction yield measurable improvements on tic-tac-toe without modifying the model weights.

Automated Knowledge Base Construction (AKBC) is a core NLP task, and recent work proposes generating knowledge bases directly from large language models (LLMs), treating the model itself as the knowledge source. However, LLMs natively possess no representation of entities, leading to duplicate entries as well as conflations. We propose GPTKB 2.0, a methodology for constructing disambiguated KBs directly from LLMs. GPTKB 2.0 incorporates on-the-fly disambiguation of entities, relations and classes, and is meticulously designed to satisfy both scalability and disambiguation accuracy. We analyze the central design decisions and characterize the trade-offs between accuracy, scale, and cost. We execute GPTKB 2.0 at scale, obtaining a materialized KB containing over 1M disambiguated entities and 38.4M triples. This represents the first million-scale LLM-native KB with explicit internal canonicalization of entities, relations, and classes, a significant departure from prior Wikimedia-centric works. GPTKB 2.0 is available at https://gptkb.org/.

On-policy training has emerged as a powerful post-training paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models, and is often enhanced by golden trajectories from stronger expert models. However, when the expert fails on harder problems, existing trajectory-guided methods lose their main source of supervision, and these failed trajectories are typically discarded as negative samples. We argue that such failures, which we call Golden Negative Trajectories, can still provide valuable reasoning signals when treated not as demonstrations to imitate, but as flawed trajectories to reflect upon. We identify a Reflection Advantage: for hard problems, reflecting on a flawed trajectory can be easier and more effective than solving the problem directly from scratch. Motivated by this, we propose ReflectRL, a lightweight plug-and-play framework that learns from Golden Negative Trajectories during on-policy training. ReflectRL first uses these trajectories to elicit Reflective Reasoning, then applies Reflective-to-Direct Policy Transition to transfer the acquired reasoning behavior back to Direct Reasoning. Experiments across 9 benchmarks, 4 LLM backbones, and 4 on-policy training methods show that ReflectRL consistently improves reasoning performance with minimal overhead.

Test-time scaling improves LLM reasoning by generating and aggregating multiple candidate answers, yet many pipelines use fixed per-query budgets that spend the same compute on easy and difficult prompts. These fixed budgets are also difficult to inspect because they do not explain why a given prompt receives a particular number of samples. We propose adaptive} test-time scaling with a lightweight fuzzy controller that maps interpretable signals, including estimated prompt complexity and model confidence, to a per-query sampling budget. The controller assigns fewer samples to easier or more confident prompts and more samples to harder or less certain prompts, making inference-time compute inspectable rather than fixed or opaque. We evaluate under a fair-alignment protocol with matched decoding settings and controlled answer selection, and compare against best-of-$N$, compute-aware scaling, and self-certainty-based baselines on question-answering and mathematical reasoning tasks. Across models and datasets, adaptive fuzzy control improves over several standard baselines and remains close to a selector-matched full-budget control while reducing the average number of samples. These findings suggest that interpretable adaptive sampling is a practical direction for more efficient test-time reasoning in large language models.

Statistical reasoning is multidimensional, yet evaluations of large language models (LLMs) typically emphasize response accuracy while overlooking how models construct and communicate statistical explanations. This study demonstrates the value of a multidimensional evaluation by combining response accuracy, response behavior, structural topic modeling, and lexical similarity analysis. The framework is applied to explanations generated by 15 current-generation LLMs responding to 90 questions drawn from four statistics examinations spanning high school, undergraduate, and graduate levels. Accuracy varied substantially across models, ranging from 55% to 78%. In contrast, structural topic modeling revealed a common conceptual organization of statistical reasoning across all models, while lexical similarity analysis identified modest but consistent vendor-specific differences in explanatory style. Models developed by the same vendor (e.g. Anthropic, OpenAI) produced explanations that were slightly more similar than models from different vendors. These findings demonstrate that statistical reasoning in contemporary LLMs cannot be characterized by accuracy alone and illustrate how complementary analyses of response behavior and model-generated explanations provide a more comprehensive evaluation of statistical reasoning in generative AI.