每天知道
你的领域
出了什么

World action models (WAMs) condition robot actions on predicted futures, but iterative video rollout increases deployment latency. We ask whether action generation requires the evolving rollout trajectory or only its future representation. Across four WAMs on all 40 LIBERO tasks, paired closed-loop interventions show that masking or reassigning future-cache values changes execution and reduces success, indicating sensitivity to future values and their assigned positions. For Joint and Cosmos-2, however, replaying one fixed final-clean key/value (K/V) cache nearly preserves unmodified execution, with $1.7$ to $1.9$~cm end-effector average displacement error and $97.9%$ to $98.2%$ success. This separates cache consumption from production: these models can reuse a fixed cache but still require iterative rollout to construct it. We therefore propose RIFT (Rollout-free Imagination via Future Tokens), which uses learned anticipation tokens to construct a complete future K/V cache in one backbone pass while retaining the original future-read interface. On LIBERO, RIFT achieves $98.8%$ success, close to rollout-based Joint, IDM, and LingBot-VA at $98.4%$ to $98.6%$, while reducing action-chunk latency by $68.2%$ to $89.1%$. On RoboTwin~2.0, RIFT reaches $92.9/92.6%$ on clean/randomized scenes, the highest observed among the evaluated methods. These results support rollout-free future conditioning without iterative video generation at deployment.

We present RT-SEMamba, a fully causal speech enhancement (SE) model built upon causal time-frequency Mamba blocks. Unlike Transformer-based architectures that rely on a growing key-value cache, Mamba propagates a fixed-size recurrent state per layer, enabling memory- and bandwidth-efficient long-form inference. We further introduce a progressive knowledge distillation (KD) strategy that compresses an 8-layer teacher into a shallow 1-layer student by jointly distilling complex spectral outputs and intermediate representations. On Voicebank-DEMAND, the 8-layer RT-SEMamba achieves 3.32 PESQ with a 25 ms algorithmic latency constraint, and the distilled 1-layer student improves over a naive 1-layer baseline from 3.06 to 3.18 PESQ while preserving the same steady-state RTF, delivering a 2.75x speedup over the teacher. These results demonstrate that state-space models with progressive KD provide a competitive quality-latency trade-off for real-time SE.

Diffusion-based generative video compression has emerged as a promising paradigm to improve perceptual quality, where latent frames are required to be encoded efficiently while serving as denoising conditions. However, existing methods neither carefully design reference and quality structures during latent coding nor account for the impact of frame-level quality variation on denoising procedure, which limits coding efficiency and aggravates artifact propagation during generative reconstruction. In this paper, we propose GVCHR, Generative Video Compression based on Hierarchical Referencing. The key idea is to organize latent frames hierarchically, where the selected high-quality references benefit both latent coding and generative reconstruction. In latent coding, GVCHR couples a hierarchical reference structure with a hierarchical quality structure, assigning more bits to lower-layer frames that are reused more frequently as references. Built on this design, we introduce Hierarchical Temporal Context Mining to exploits complementary short- and long-term temporal context for effective latent coding. In generative reconstruction, the coding-side hierarchy is incorporated into a Hierarchical Attentive Adapter which is attached to a video diffusion transformer. This adapter uses hierarchical attention to restrict each latent frame to attend only to the same- or lower-layer references, thereby reducing artifact propagation during denoising. Experiments validate GVCHR on multiple benchmarks. Compared with the previous state-of-the-art method, GVCHR achieves 50.5% and 54.0% BD-rate gains in terms of LPIPS and DISTS, respectively, while also delivering clearly improved visual quality.

Transversal CNOT (TCNOT) gates can accelerate fault-tolerant quantum computation (FTQC) in the surface code by reducing the number of syndrome extraction rounds required between logical operations from $O(d)$ to $O(1)$. This is particularly attractive for quantum platforms with long-range connectivity, such as neutral atoms. However, dense TCNOT schedules substantially increase the classical decoding workload. TCNOTs propagate errors across multiple surface-code patches, enlarging the spatiotemporal region that must be decoded jointly. Consequently, denser TCNOT schedules increase decoding latency and memory requirements and potentially exceed available decoder capacity. Moreover, because the detector error model (DEM) of each decoding window depends on the TCNOT schedule, exhaustively precomputing all possible window-level DEMs is infeasible, requiring just-in-time (JIT) DEM compilation. Thus, the practical benefit of TCNOT gates is limited not only by quantum hardware performance but also by classical decoding and DEM-compilation capacity. We introduce PACE, a decoder-aware scheduling framework for TCNOT-based FTQC. PACE first mitigates the decoder-side costs of aggressive TCNOT scheduling through three complementary techniques. Hybrid Window Decoding assigns different decoders for each decoding window according to its DEM structure. DEM Stitch generates schedule-specific window-level DEMs just in time by assembling reusable precompiled fragments. Sub-window Parallel Decoding decomposes large windows into smaller sub-windows with graph-coloring formulation. Building on these techniques, PACE then performs decoder-aware scheduling to maximize TCNOT concurrency within the available decoder resources. Our evaluation shows the trade-off between quantum acceleration and classical decoding cost, revealing the limitations of current decoding systems for TCNOT-based FTQC.

Edge-deployed vision systems in target recognition, surveillance, autonomous vehicles, and drone domains require hierarchical inference pipelines where a detection model identifies objects of interest and downstream classifiers provide fine-grained attribute analysis. Running all models on the GPU creates a serial bottleneck that limits real-time throughput as pipeline stages grow. Modern edge SoCs pair GPUs with dedicated neural accelerators (NPUs, DLAs) capable of concurrent execution, yet deploying custom models on these accelerators remains impractical due to strict operator constraints, quantization incompatibilities, and an undocumented end-to-end pipeline. We target NVIDIA Jetson DLA cores as the representative platform. We present a five-step methodology for zero GPU fallback DLA INT8 deployment of classification backbones, comprising architecture adaptation, manual dynamic range workaround to rescue TensorRT's implicit quantization (recovering 94.0% accuracy from implicit quantization's 75%) for rapid pipeline validation before explicit quantization, quantization-aware training, ONNX graph surgery for DLA compilation, and a concurrent GPU-detection/DLA-classification inference pipeline. We document nine engineering constraints with root-cause analysis and generalizable solutions. Validation on a dual-head person attribute classifier running on DLA alongside a GPU object detector on a Jetson Orin NX demonstrates near-zero pipeline overhead (12.5 vs. 13.3~FPS detector-only at 1080p), with dual-DLA scaling at no additional cost. The methodology is backbone-agnostic and generalizes to any detection-classification edge pipeline.

Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) models are attractive for edge deployment because they provide high model capacity while activating only a small subset of parameters per token, improving compute efficiency. However, MoE inference at the edge is fundamentally limited by memory. Expert parameters are large and often reside in off-chip memory due to capacity, cost, and power constraints, putting expert loading to the critical path. We present APEX: Adaptive Expert Prefetching, a predictive resource management framework that overlaps expert loading with useful computation. APEX introduces a lightweight prefetch router that predicts candidate experts before the attention block to dynamically fetch additional experts using a learned confidence model. This adaptive strategy achieves over 99% overlap accuracy, significantly outperforming fixed top-k prefetching techniques. APEX supports two execution modes: a correctness-preserving mode that guarantees exact routing semantics, and a stall-free mode that eliminates residual stalls by operating on available experts with negligible impact on application accuracy. Across multiple MoE models, the correctness-preserving mode reduces per-token latency by up to 26% and improves energy-delay product (EDP) by up to 41% over state-of-the-art baselines, while the stall-free mode provides additional efficiency gains with negligible impact on application accuracy. These results establish adaptive, confidence-driven expert prefetching as an effective approach for efficient MoE inference on edge systems.

Growing demand for artificial intelligence (AI) inference services requires scalable infrastructure, yet centralized serving costs rise with demand. We propose a collaborative distributed inference system combining dedicated infrastructure with resources contributed by service users. Dedicated resources provide baseline capacity for maintaining quality of service (QoS), while volunteered resources absorb increasing demand without proportional growth in centralized infrastructure. To capture stochastic and dynamic interactions among users, resources, tasks, and policies, we develop a high-dimensional generative Markov model with structured temporal factorization. The model supports simulation and provides a foundation for task scheduling and QoS-aware resource allocation optimization. We evaluate the system across user populations, resource capacities, and centralized and distributed scheduling policies. Simulations show that distributed scheduling becomes increasingly advantageous as the user population grows, improving request completion and P99 latency while substantially reducing dedicated resource consumption. These results demonstrate the feasibility of user-assisted collaborative inference for infrastructure-efficient autoscaling.

Long-running conversational agents increasingly rely on a memory system to avoid resending the whole conversation each turn, yet how much that costs to serve has received little systematic benchmarking. We compare three memory systems (Mem0, Hindsight, and Mastra Observational Memory) against two reference strategies — a fixed-size rolling window and resubmitting the full transcript — across two backbones and conversations of up to 400 turns, pairing every cost measurement with answer accuracy on 665 LoCoMo questions. First, a memory system's serving cost cannot be predicted from conversation length and message size alone: a regression that tracks the two reference strategies closely misses the memory systems by 18-69%, their cost driven instead by internal memory behavior. Second, a break-even analysis shows that whether — and when — a memory system becomes cheaper to serve than the full transcript is highly sensitive to the system and the backbone, from the first tens of turns for the cheapest to never within 400 turns for the most expensive. Third, no system wins on both axes: accuracy spans 21-54%, and the backbone choice drives cost as much as the memory system does.

Post-training quantization pipelines routinely leave the softmax output layer in high precision. Yet in small LLMs with modern vocabularies, the head holds 15--30% of all parameters, so a nominal ``2-bit'' model with an fp16 head can store several times as many bits per weight. We pose softmax-layer quantization as a rate-distortion problem under the KL divergence between the original and quantized output distributions. A second-order analysis reveals a class-aware geometry: quantization error is weighted jointly by feature covariance and class-specific softmax curvature. A separability approximation replaces the $Kn\times Kn$ Cholesky with one $n\times n$ factorization rescaled per class, making the lattice encodable by successive interference cancellation, with both statistics from a single forward pass. The resulting method, SoftWater, gives fine grids to frequent, low-variance classes and coarse grids to rare ones, a large gap under Zipfian token distributions. Across five models from 1B to 32B, SoftWater outperforms the released WaterSIC quantizer (near-optimal under linear-layer WMSE but not output KL) at matched head rates on 59 of 60 test points, using none of that pipeline's refinements and cutting head-induced KL by $6.5\times$--$8.3\times$ at 2 bits. On Llama-3.2-1B-Instruct with quantized bodies, a 2-bit head removes 45--60% of stored bytes for a $2.9$--$3.7%$ perplexity increase. Because the class-side statistic comes from calibration data, matching calibration to the deployment domain gives the lowest KL on that domain throughout. On a tied model, a 4-bit head is near-lossless and a 2-bit head costs under 4% perplexity, making head quantization of such models practical.

A companion empirical study conjectured that MoA-guided dense matrix multiplication would need per-CCD recalibration on AMD EPYC Bergamo; allocation access to that machine was declined, and this paper reports the resulting test on NCSA Delta, an architecturally related chip. Its central claim: every result here traces to shape, not architecture in the abstract — cache shape, access-pattern shape, and co-tenancy itself treated as a shape parameter. The corrected block size M_C = 256 follows directly from Delta's real 512 KB L2 divided by the data type's own byte width, no parameter fit after the fact, and outperforms the M1-Pro-inherited M_C = 64 by 30--59% — a block's shape finally matching the cache shape it was always meant to occupy. The same reasoning extends to a shared level: co-tenancy treated as raw capacity fails by an order of magnitude, while co-tenancy treated as a shape parameter — capacity divided by concurrent consumers — survives. A controlled NUMA experiment isolates a third shape: GEBP and MoA-pipelined compute the identical result at identical achieved bandwidth, yet GEBP loses 13.9% of its throughput to remote memory while MoA-pipelined loses only 2.4% — not a speed difference, a difference in the shape each kernel's access pattern traces through memory. The headline result reproduces the M1 Pro's exact three-of-four win over a Strassen-GEBP hybrid, a pattern AWS Graviton4 did not achieve. One question is named rather than resolved: whether Delta's larger MoA-over-GEBP margin reflects genuine speed or an unmatched utilization fraction. Every result here was predicted before it was measured, not fitted after.

Heterogeneous multi-agent LLM systems, where agents are powered by different model families, can outperform homogeneous configurations by reducing redundant reasoning patterns. Yet existing communication protocols either operate through text, discarding the sender's internal representations, or require architectural homogeneity for latent-level transfer. We identify the entity grounding problem in cross-architecture communication: cross-attention bridges that transfer continuous representations across different LLM families suffer from rare-token compression collapse, where entity identity is lost in the continuous bottleneck (bridge-only F1 ~30%). We propose XBRIDGE, a decode-free communication protocol that addresses this through two mechanisms. Lexical Anchor Mapping (LAM) maps the sender's original context tokens to the receiver's vocabulary, providing discrete entity anchors. A Latent Enrichment Bridge (LEB) lets the receiver query the sender's hidden states for contextual enrichment. The entity anchors ground the bridge's contextual signals to specific entities through the receiver's own self-attention. Across three model families (Llama, Qwen, and Mistral), seven benchmarks, and both communication directions, XBRIDGE outperforms text-based communication on all seven tasks for each model pair while achieving 11x lower latency, and in a same-architecture setting it also exceeds a KV-sharing baseline on six of seven tasks. LEB requires only 264M trainable parameters (3.8% of the receiver), is trained on a small balanced sample set, and adds negligible inference overhead.

Financial forecasting models are typically developed in full precision, yet production deployment often requires low-precision inference to reduce memory and computational cost. Post-training quantization (PTQ) enables such deployment without retraining. However, reliable activation quantization requires calibration: activation ranges are estimated from historical data before deployment and then remain fixed during future inference. The importance of this deployment choice for financial forecasting remains poorly understood. We present a systematic study of activation calibration for PTQ in cross-sectional volatility forecasting on the S&P 500. Our evaluation covers seven representative neural architectures, eight walk-forward test years (2018-2025), and 560 trained models. We find that activation calibration has little effect at 8 bits but becomes the primary determinant of predictive performance at 4 bits. Under default absolute-maximum (abs-max) calibration, static 4-bit quantization of both weights and activations removes 11-62% of the full-precision mean information coefficient in affected architectures. Replacing abs-max with percentile calibration recovers 53-94% of this degradation in the four most affected architectures. The preferred activation range also varies across market periods. Narrow ranges improve resolution under typical market conditions but lose part of their advantage when test-period market dispersion exceeds the calibration history. These findings show that activation calibration is a first-class deployment decision for reliable 4-bit PTQ in financial forecasting. When substantial degradation remains, 8-bit activations or weight-only 4-bit quantization provide more robust deployment choices.

Boosted decision trees (BDTs) are widely used in latency-critical applications, but efficient hardware deployment remains challenging. Existing designs often rely on uniform or manually tuned fixed-point formats, which can introduce unnecessary hardware cost or accuracy loss. This work presents the FQTree algorithm{https://github.com/ecs-bristol/FQTree} for fine-grained quantization-aware training of BDTs, together with the QXGB framework for automatic hardware generation. FQTree introduces a hardware-oriented leaf-value quantization scheme that uses a global quantization step together with a tree-wise shift, enabling compact non-negative integer leaf representations, controlled clipping/pruning, and bias folding to reduce datapath cost. This work further applies this quantization during boosting so that later trees adapt to the errors of the already-quantized ensemble, and then lowers the trained model into low-latency hardware implementations through a compiler-based flow. Results on JSC, MNIST, and NID show that our method reduces LUT usage by 26-57% compared with the state-of-the-art FPGA-based BDT designs while matching or improving accuracy.

A faster storage device should make serving faster. We find the opposite. High-Bandwidth Flash (HBF) stacks NAND behind a wide, package-local interface, promising flash-scale capacity with far lower read latency and higher bandwidth than an SSD. The obvious move is to keep an SSD-style Mooncake KV-offloading stack and swap in HBF underneath. We built that system and measured it: an extended TokenSim, four complete two-hour Qwen-Bailian production traces, five dense and mixture-of-experts models, and H100/B200 profiles. The upgrade backfires. Average end-to-end latency rises 2--5.5$\times$ and maximum SLO goodput falls 1.1--2.7$\times$ across H100 and B200, so the faster device yields a slower system. A cost-benefit model explains the paradox: a faster far tier pays off only when read I/O is the bottleneck, reads outweigh writes, and delivered bandwidth is sustainable. Transient KV violates all three at once. Buying flash through the package costs GPU near-tier capacity and bandwidth, while HBF's own read/write latency barely matters: scaling it 3.75$\times$ moves latency less than 1%. Worse, the two-tier hierarchy keeps reuse in the near tier and hands HBF a relentless write-heavy stream. Writes outnumber reads on every trace, so a 3D-ICE model shows the stack hits its thermal limit well below peak bandwidth, and a TLC tier wears out sooner than the SSD pool it replaced. The device is fine; the drop-in deployment is not. HBF sucks as an SSD replacement for transient KV, but earns its place in LLM serving when used selectively with reuse-aware placement, write budgeting, and thermal coordination.

Pose-driven human animation synthesizes a video of a target person from a single reference image and a driving pose stream. Real-time generation is essential for interactive applications such as live streaming, telepresence, and virtual avatars, yet diffusion-based systems require minutes to hours per clip, precluding responsive interaction. We present LiveAnimate, to our knowledge the first animation system to combine real-time streaming with stable long-form generation at billion scale, built on a 14B-parameter video Diffusion Transformer (DiT). A two-stage training pipeline first adapts a pretrained bidirectional DiT into a block-causal autoregressive generator through Reference-Anchored Teacher-Forcing Adaptation, and then reduces the sampling budget to three steps through Block-wise Self-Forcing Distillation. To preserve appearance over extended streams, we introduce Pose-Retrieval Sink Attention (PR-Sink), a bounded KV-cache mechanism combining a Static Sink that permanently anchors the first generated block, a Dynamic Sink that holds a pose-retrieved historical block, and a three-slot Rolling Window. When a pose recurs, PR-Sink restores the relevant appearance context without retaining the entire sequence, so memory and per-block latency remain constant regardless of stream duration. Together with Ulysses sequence parallelism and operator fusion, these designs enable 19.63\,FPS streaming inference on two NVIDIA H100 GPUs. On a three-minute benchmark, LiveAnimate maintains nearly constant perceptual quality and identity from the first 30 seconds to the final minute, while prior systems degrade substantially or require hours of offline computation for the same rollout. These results establish a new operating point in quality, latency, and duration for interactive full-body animation.

Video diffusion transformers are costly to sample: every denoising step applies self-attention over a long 3D token sequence, a quadratic cost that dominates as resolution and duration grow. Sparse attention reduces this cost without retraining, but existing methods pursue aggressive sparsity, where further speedup costs disproportionately more attention fidelity. We target the opposite end of this trade-off: fix near-lossless fidelity by construction, and remove as much computation as this constraint permits. Two observations make this regime practical: roughly 40% of block interactions can be removed while retaining 99% of the attention mass, and the high-mass support remains stable across denoising steps. We propose LoSA, a training-free sparse-attention method that fixes a retained-mass threshold of 99% rather than a sparsity ratio: it measures exact block attention masses at one early dense step, keeps, for each head and query block, the smallest key/value block set meeting the threshold, and reuses the frozen block indices for all remaining steps. On Wan2.1-1.3B, LoSA alone gives a $1.36\times$ speedup with a 0.06-point VBench Overall drop. The benefit is largest under composition: combined with feature caching, LoSA reaches a $3.2\times$ speedup on HunyuanVideo at a 0.02-point drop, versus 0.32 points for the strongest sparse baseline at comparable speed. Across three video diffusion transformers and speedups up to $3.2\times$, LoSA consistently achieves the best training-free speed-quality trade-off.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) repeatedly prefills identical text chunks across queries, incurring redundant computations. Position-Independent Caching (PIC) mitigates it by reusing precomputed Key-Value (KV) across positions, but its efficiency is constrained by the large volume of text tokens. Rendering text chunks as images can compress the text into fewer visual tokens, but the rendered-image PIC suffers more severe quality degradation than the text PIC. This representation-specific gap primarily arises from contextual mismatches across independently compiled caches and the loss of fine-grained textual evidence during visual compression. Existing PIC repair methods mainly address the former through selective recomputation, but they incur online computation and cannot recover lost textual details. We propose QV-PIC, a query-aware dual-resolution PIC reuse framework guided by model-native templates. Offline, QV-PIC compiles visual caches under the model's native chat-template prefix, improving PIC quality without online recomputation. Online, it preserves global context with low resolution and restores fine-grained textual evidence within a high-resolution budget by cumulative query relevance scores, retaining the efficiency benefit of visual compression. Across six tasks, QV-PIC improves average F1 by 21.6 points over vanilla rendered-image PIC, closes the gap to vanilla text PIC, and surpasses optimized text PIC by 2.58 F1 while reducing TTFT by 17.2%. Relative to full prefill, it cuts TTFT by 83.8%.

Use this plain-text version for the arXiv abstract field: Learned image compression (LIC) models achieve strong rate-distortion performance but are hindered by high computational complexity and encoding-decoding mismatches across heterogeneous hardware platforms. Uniform fixed-precision quantization alleviates these issues but suffers severe quality degradation at low bit widths because it ignores differences in the quantization sensitivities of individual layers. To enable efficient and accurate low-bit deployment of pretrained LIC models, we propose HAMP-LIC, a Hessian-aware mixed-precision post-training quantization (PTQ) framework with a four-stage optimization strategy. First, block-wise sensitivity is estimated from the Hessian trace to capture second-order importance. Second, a task-aware refinement module adjusts these sensitivities by jointly considering quantization distortion and rate-distortion performance. Third, guided by the refined sensitivity profile, bit widths are allocated under a global model-size constraint to balance efficiency and reconstruction quality. Finally, block-wise reconstruction using a small calibration set further suppresses quantization error. Experiments on representative LIC models, including Minnen2018 and Cheng2020, demonstrate that HAMP-LIC achieves up to 4.85x model compression with as little as 0.59% BD-rate loss. It consistently outperforms existing fixed- and mixed-precision PTQ methods across multiple datasets while completely eliminating cross-platform encoding-decoding errors.

NVIDIA's published specifications give the Blackwell Ultra GPU (B300) a dense-compute ratio of roughly 30:1 between FP8 and INT8 tensor-core throughput; its predecessors, H200 and B200, both provide 1:1. We audit what this deprioritization means in practice by tracing INT8 W8A8 support through four layers of the stack: the published specifications, the PTX ISA, NVIDIA's CUTLASS kernel library, and the two major open-source LLM serving engines (vLLM and SGLang). We find a consistent, layered withdrawal: (i) the PTX ISA never exposes the fifth-generation tensor-core integer path (tcgen05.mma with .kind::i8) on sm_103a, even though the same PTX revision extends the FP4 kinds to that target, leaving legacy warp-level IMMA as the only architecturally legal integer tensor-core path on B300; (ii) CUTLASS's kernel generator explicitly skips INT8 UMMA generation for any build targeting 103a, while generating FP8 unconditionally; (iii) vLLM ships no INT8 GEMM for Blackwell and fails with a hard runtime error at the first forward pass, after the model has loaded; and (iv) SGLang's ahead-of-time INT8 GEMM stops at Sm90, while its FP8 tuning configurations already cover B200. We document an escape hatch (rerouting vLLM's INT8 path to a JIT-compiled Triton backend via an environment variable), a false-negative trap in the obvious profiler methodology for detecting "native INT8" on sm_103, and the practical failure semantics that make naive testing expensive. Together, these findings show that a quantization format's availability is a property of the whole stack rather than of the model or the spec sheet. Four distinct layers, three of them NVIDIA's own, withdrew INT8 support in mutually consistent ways, and a format that is nominally present on the datasheet is, by default, undeployable on this hardware.

As users increasingly turn to Large Language Models (LLMs) for information and advice on political matters, particularly during election periods, the political preferences expressed by these systems have become a matter of public interest. Prior research has shown that interactions with LLMs can influence users' political attitudes and choices, raising questions about how these models themselves evaluate political actors. In this paper, we investigate whether and how LLMs express preferences toward political parties and political leaders. We introduce a systematic and reproducible auditing framework in which multiple LLMs are prompted to evaluate parties and leaders across nine criteria. Rather than attempting to infer the models' "true" political beliefs, we focus on their observable behavior, examining consistency across evaluations, differences between models, refusal rates, and sensitivity to prompt formulation. We further investigate how these evaluations vary when models are instructed to adopt different personas. We demonstrate the framework through an Italian case study, providing a systematic analysis of LLM-generated political evaluations on italian parties and leaders.

Model merging by task arithmetic works until it doesn't, and the field diagnoses why with magnitudes: layerwise representation bias, deviations from cross-task linearity, parameter overlap. Tracking the exact layerwise cross-term of merged LLMs through a factorial ledger and intervening on it directly, we find magnitude insufficient - and inconsistent across model families - as a diagnostic axis. An exact decomposition of the layerwise flux shows it is dominated by amplifying transport of the existing cross-term (~65-70% in both families, gain >1 per late block), and erasing the term is undone by propagation - rebuilt to 99% of its norm at cosine 0.99 - unless applied near the output; a basin test with six starting displacements establishes the carried direction as an attractor of the forward pass. That direction is causally load-bearing: erasure along it removes expressed interference dose-dependently and saturates at exact erasure, while norm-matched wrong-direction controls fail or backfire. Instruction wrappers gate the effect: the same erasure finds 13x less relative interference to remove under a wrapper that internally amplifies the cross-term, because the wrapper drowns the interaction in a template-pinned main effect rather than shrinking it - a structure that replicates across further instruction templates but not under a length-matched control. Magnitude, by contrast, is at best a coarse correlate, and the striking +-15% "universality" of naive bfloat16 generation turns out to be quantization roughness. Task pairs whose local cross-term generation differs by at most 1.9x differ by 14x-337x in causally removable interference. All 46 predictions were preregistered and frozen before their data; falsifications, including of our own headline expectations and of behavioral recovery under a validated continuous endpoint, are reported as such.

Multiple-choice benchmarks are widely used to evaluate large language models, but MCQ scores conflate knowledge with sensitivity to option order, which makes them unreliable measures of model knowledge. In this paper, we test whether preventing a model from seeing option labels while committing to an answer removes positional influence and, in turn, improves performance. We evaluate two different strategies for mitigating bias. The first uses a generation-then-matching approach, and the second scores options in isolation, which is positionally unbiased by construction. Neither reliably improves accuracy. A complete decomposition shows that the bottleneck is withholding options, not the matching step. The only configuration that consistently matches the baseline is the one that shows the model all options paired with an LLM matcher. However, eliminating positional influence entirely still does not reliably yield accuracy gains, while cyclic permutation often improves them. For two-stage prompting, an aggregate measure of recall imbalance and a direct per-question measure of order sensitivity both fail to show reliable debiasing.

While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable progress, visual understanding and generation are typically treated as divergent objectives. Existing unified frameworks often rely on discrete visual tokenization or diffusion objectives whose generative targets differ from the continuous representations consumed by visual understanding models, making direct transfer to enhance existing pretrained MLLMs non-trivial. In this work, we present GAS, a generation-guided training framework that reinterprets visual generation as auxiliary supervision for representation learning. Concretely, GAS adapts Next Embedding Prediction (NEP) as a cross-modal generation paradigm within a decoupled Mixture-of-Transformers (MoT) architecture. By maintaining a shared lower trunk and parallel upper layers, GAS lets generation losses enrich the shared visual pathway with finer spatial precision and stronger visual retention while shielding the upper understanding layers from direct generation gradients. To maximize this synergy, we further construct highly correlated generation tasks that demand deep cognitive grounding rather than generic synthesis alone. Across model scales and training stages, GAS improves aggregate multimodal understanding, with its most reliable gains on perception and spatial comprehension. Crucially, because the auxiliary generation branch is discarded after training, these gains incur zero inference overhead. Extensive controlled comparisons and representation-level analyses further clarify when and why generation-guided training benefits understanding, and demonstrate the feasibility of generation-guided training as a practical route to stronger multimodal understanding.

Treating patients with combinations of drugs reduces the risk of resistance to any individual drug. Finding effective combinations is difficult because the large search space makes combinatorial screens prohibitively expensive, time consuming, and often technically infeasible. Predictive models can fill this gap, yet existing methods typically require molecular profiling of each sample and per-cohort training, limiting their applicability when time and tissue are scarce. To address this challenge, we introduce ScreenShot, a hierarchical transformer pretrained on 40 drug screening datasets covering 3,700 drugs and 6,000 biological samples, whose architecture mirrors the nested structure of screening data. Given a few-shot context of observations from a new patient, ScreenShot predicts the response of the sample to combination therapies through in-context learning, operating directly on functional measurements with no fine-tuning and no molecular profiling. On four held-out datasets, ScreenShot outperforms all baselines in both prediction accuracy and identification of selectively effective treatments. ScreenShot's internal representations are directly useful for experimental design: we use them to drive a weighted k-means++ active learning strategy that selects which experiments to run, achieving the same hit detection as uniform screening with a third of the budget. Source code and interactive dashboard: https://github.com/tansey-lab/screenshot.

Recent advances in EEG foundation models have demonstrated the potential of large-scale pretraining to enable generalizable neural decoding across subjects, recording environments, and datasets. However, dominant pretraining paradigms face key challenges: masked autoencoding tends to prioritize low-level signal reconstruction over task-relevant semantics, while autoregressive modeling creates a mismatch between continuous neural dynamics and discrete token spaces. To address these challenges, new strategies are needed to effectively align continuous EEG representations with natural-language semantics and enable their integration with large language models. Accordingly, we propose Brain Latent Predictive Model (BLPM), an EEG-language foundation model that reformulates heterogeneous EEG decoding tasks as a continuous semantic embedding prediction problem. BLPM introduces a Continuous EEG Latent Predictive (CELP) encoder that learns transferable representations through latent target prediction. Building on these representations, a Multi-Query Semantic Decomposition (MQSD) module extracts task-relevant information and aligns continuous EEG representations with textual semantics within a shared latent space according to their semantic relationships. Experiments across multiple benchmarks demonstrate consistent generalization performance across diverse tasks, establishing continuous latent semantic prediction as an effective paradigm for EEG-language foundation models.

We propose claim-level falsification as a principle for test-time scaling and instantiate it through Claim-Level Reliability Assessment (CLR), a training-free framework that reallocates test-time compute from additional solution sampling to targeted verification. Since whole-trace evaluation often obscures decisive errors due to signal dilution from routine tokens, CLR condenses each reasoning trace into a compact set of decision-critical claims, thereby isolating its logical anchors. Furthermore, recognizing the inherent difficulty of generating entirely correct solutions under fixed model capabilities, CLR shifts the focus to semantic falsification. This approach exploits a fundamental asymmetry between solution construction and claim refutation. Constructing a valid solution requires a flawless reasoning path, whereas refuting an incorrect claim requires identifying only a single decisive flaw. This targeted search for negative evidence systematically compresses the survival space of high-confidence incorrect traces, effectively suppressing erroneous consensus via nonlinear reliability scoring. Across four LLMs and four reasoning benchmarks under matched budgets, CLR generally improves upon pass@1 and self-consistency. On GPT-OSS-20B/CMIMC25, for instance, CLR exceeds pass@1 by 27.15 percentage-points and raises self-consistency accuracy from 77.50% to 82.19% with 37.0% fewer tokens.

Transformer-based methods have achieved strong performance in monocular 3D human pose estimation, but most existing approaches organise spatial and temporal reasoning as separate stages, which may weaken unified spatial-temporal interdependencies inherent in human motion and compress frame-level structural information before temporal modelling. In this paper, we propose HSTGFormer, a graph-enhanced Transformer framework that reformulates spatial-temporal reasoning as localised coupled graph aggregation over joint-time nodes. Specifically, HSTGFormer introduces a Hyper Spatial-Temporal Graph (HSTG), which decomposes global spatial-temporal reasoning into local spatial-temporal receptive fields around individual joint-time nodes by extending per-frame skeleton graphs into temporal neighbourhoods, thereby enabling structure-aware coupled reasoning while preserving local structural motion information. It further incorporates an Adaptive Dual-Scale Temporal Graph (ADSTG) to capture joint-specific temporal dependencies over complementary short- and long-range windows. A lightweight node-wise fusion module further adaptively integrates the two graph representations for each joint-time node. Experiments on Human3.6M and MPI-INF-3DHP show that HSTGFormer achieves strong accuracy with high computational efficiency.

Continual pre-training (CPT) has been widely adopted as a method for domain adaptation in large language models. However, CPT has consistently been accompanied by challenges, such as the difficulty of acquiring large-scale domain-specific datasets and high computational costs. In this study, we propose a novel method called Test-Enhanced Learning for Language Model Enrichment (TELLME) to alleviate these issues. TELLME leverages the TestEnhanced Learning (TEL) principle, whereby the model's training efficiency is improved using quizzes during training. It integrates this principle with CPT, thereby promoting efficient domain-specific knowledge acquisition and long-term memory retention. Experimental results demonstrate that TELLME outperforms existing methods by up to 23.6% in the financial domain and achieves a 9.8% improvement in long-term memory retention.

Large language models are increasingly trained and deployed with long contexts that span documents, code repositories, and interaction histories. This scaling reflects the implicit assumption that training on longer contexts will only help the model by exposing it to richer evidence. We challenge this view by studying how the context window shapes a model's mode of learning, shifting it between parametric internalization and contextualization. We propose the Information Abundance Paradox, which hypothesizes that abundant relevant information in the training context can reduce the incentive to encode that information parametrically, thereby increasing reliance on context. In pretraining with long documents, increasing the context window improves language modeling, natural language understanding, and closed-book MCQA only up to an intermediate optimum, after which performance consistently declines. In supervised fine-tuning, more task-relevant train-time context improves performance with supporting context, but reduces robustness when context is absent or misleading at test time. Our analysis suggests that this behavior arises when longer context provides a lower complexity solution. Mechanistically, training with informative context shifts gradient pressure from feed-forward networks, often linked to parametric knowledge, toward attention modules, and causal interventions show that this shift increases reliance on context during inference. Overall, these findings support the Information Abundance Paradox and suggest that scaling toward near-infinite context is not simply a matter of supplying more data, even when high-quality long-context data is abundant.

Medical devices are becoming more software-intensive, connected, and AI-enabled. Their development requires risk-management evidence aligned with ISO 14971 and, for software, IEC 62304. This evidence must be kept consistent across requirements, design decisions, software changes, verification results, complaints, and post-market data. These tasks are costly and depend on scarce safety and domain experts. Large language models (LLMs) may reduce parts of this effort because medical-device safety work is highly document-based. However, current LLM-based safety-engineering studies often address isolated methods, rely on generic prompting or public examples, and provide limited support for source links, traceability, uncertainty handling, lifecycle updates, and recorded expert review. This limits their use in regulated medical-device development. This paper argues that the central research problem is not safety-text generation, but source-linked safety-knowledge support. We propose an evidence-grounded framework that connects device artifacts, controlled knowledge storage and retrieval, method-specific generation of candidate safety items, critique and uncertainty checks, and recorded expert review. The framework prepares, links, checks, and updates candidate safety artifacts for expert decision-making. It does not decide whether a device is safe and does not provide regulatory approval. We also outline an evaluation strategy using non-public or newly built medical-device case studies and expert reference analyses to assess coverage, correctness, relevance, traceability, duplicate rate, unsupported claims, and review effort.