每天知道
你的领域
出了什么

We study federated soft clustering over federated learning (FL) networks of devices that each hold a private local dataset and fit a personalized Gaussian mixture model (GMM). Generalized total variation minimization (GTVMin) couples the local maximum likelihood problems through a graph regularizer that penalizes a discrepancy between the models of connected nodes. The choice of discrepancy measure is a key design decision: we compare a squared Euclidean distance between model parameters, which requires component matching, with two measures that compare the local model distributions directly and hence need no matching: a Monte-Carlo approximated Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence and a closed-form maximum mean discrepancy (MMD). All three resulting GTVMin instances are optimized by synchronous projected gradient updates; for the smooth MMD instance we provide a convergence guarantee to stationary points. We characterize their computational cost and evaluate their robustness to data heterogeneity.

Generative models are increasingly central to many de novo discovery pipelines, in which designs are generated at scale and filtered through virtual screens to determine a set of candidates to experimentally validate. While Bayesian optimization (BO) is a natural fit for this setting, as it uses past evaluations to guide future proposals, the computational overhead required for its sequential decision-making becomes a bottleneck when virtual screens are relatively cheap. We make BO practical in this regime by exploiting the unique combination of a linear model constrained to a spherical domain where high-dimensional latents concentrate. We build off recent work justifying the use of linear surrogates, while deriving nearly closed-form solutions to the surrogate modelling and acquisition problems that exploit spherical symmetry. The result is at least a 100x speedup over state-of-the art baselines, with matching or improved performance across molecular and image generation benchmarks. Altogether, our method makes BO a practical drop-in for de novo pipelines where it was previously too slow to consider.

The rapid expansion of multimodal models has surfaced formidable bottlenecks in computation, memory, and deployment, catalyzing the rise of Efficient Multimodal Learning (EML) as a pivotal research frontier. Despite intensive progress, a cohesive understanding of what, how, and where efficiency is manifested across the learning stack remains fragmented. This survey systematizes the EML landscape by introducing the first structured, model-to-system taxonomy. We distill insights from over 300 seminal works into three hierarchical levels--model, algorithm, and system--addressing architectural parsimony, execution refinement, and hardware-aware orchestration, respectively. Moving beyond a purely categorical review, we offer a methodological synthesis of the vertical synergies between these layers, elucidating how cross-layer co-design contributes to the fundamental "Efficiency-Utility-Privacy" trade-off. Through an integrative case study of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), we trace the field's evolutionary trajectory from initial structural adjustments to modern full-stack resource orchestration. Furthermore, we provide a holistic discussion and application-specific optimization blueprints for diverse domains and posit a paradigm shift toward self-regulating intelligence, where efficiency is an intrinsic, emergent property of the model's fundamental design rather than a post-hoc constraint. Finally, we present open challenges and future directions that will define the trajectory of EML research. This survey establishes a structured framework for multimodal systems that are not only high-performing and generalizable but natively efficient and ready for ubiquitous deployment. A continuously updated version is available at https://github.com/pwang322/Efficient-Multimodal-Learning-Survey.

Large language models (LLMs) provide a flexible interface for long-horizon robot planning, but generated plans often fail to respect embodiment constraints, recover from planning errors, or reason effectively under partial observability. We present GAVEL, a framework for verifying and repairing long-horizon LLM planning built around an explicit graph world model. The graph represents relevant object-relations, action pre-conditions and effects, and probabilistic beliefs over unobserved object locations. This model can predict the consequences of LLM-generated actions before execution, detect violations, and repair those whose corrections follow directly from the world model. This method also reserves LLM replanning solely for errors requiring semantic reasoning. For multi-task instructions, GAVEL reasons over distributions of possible object locations to reorder remaining subtasks and minimize expected search cost. We evaluate GAVEL on BEHAVIOR-1K across 100 single long-horizon tasks and 500 multi-task instructions. With Qwen3-8B, GAVEL improves single-task success from 41.2% to 91.8% and multi-task success from 19.9% to 92.6%. Distributional belief reasoning also reduces travel distance by approximately 5.4% compared with a static variant. These improvements show that an explicit graph world model harness can substantially improve the reliability and efficiency of long-horizon embodied planning across compact and frontier hosted LLM capabilities.

Tool-augmented large language model (LLM) agents fail in a way no tool-selection or tool-security method addresses: they call tools that do not exist and pass arguments no schema declares. Existing defenses either pick the right tool (selection) or constrain what an agent may do with real tools (gating), both of which presuppose the emitted call refers to a real tool at all. We show this is a structural blind spot: a hallucinated call is by construction not a decision any gate made, so no gate can reject it. This paper is primarily a measurement and benchmark study. We give a five-class taxonomy of tool hallucination (H1-H5) and, as a reference point, the Resolution Rung: a training-free, closed-world resolver (registry membership plus a signature check) whose interest is where it must sit, not what it computes. We prove hallucination defense must precede any causal gate, and characterize the one irreducible residue (borrowed arguments schema-indistinguishable from a valid call). Across ten hosted models under two invocation surfaces we measure 322 genuine hallucinations; fabricated-tool calls concentrate on the unconstrained raw-JSON surface (34 vs. 3), and model scale does not help (a 675B model matches a 7-8B one). We then extend to the Model Context Protocol, where merging several servers into one namespace creates hallucination surfaces a single registry cannot express (a second taxonomy, M1-M5); on the live MCP surface we measure 154 hallucinations, including from frontier models that were clean on the single-registry surface, because collisions and shadowing are structural to the merge. We release the versioned Hallucinated-Tools Benchmark (HTB) so any resolver is comparable across submissions.

LLM coding agents now generate complex programs at a scale that makes thorough human review increasingly difficult, raising the risk of safety and security failures. Common approaches, including fuzz testing, static analysis, and LLM-as-a-Verifier, can detect many failures but struggle to cover all possible edge cases. Formal verification addresses this by providing machine-checkable guarantees over specified properties, but traditionally demands substantial manual specification and proof engineering. We introduce a unified multi-agent framework, MAGS, that generates executable programs with formal safety guarantees, using Dafny as a verification-aware intermediate representation where safety properties can be mechanically checked. MAGS formalizes and freezes human-audited APIs and safety requirements, translates generated code into Dafny, repairs violations using verifier feedback, and compiles verified programs back into executable code. We evaluate MAGS on 100 CUDA kernels, 100 terminal scripts, and 20 robotic-arm tasks. Across all 220 examples, it achieves a 100% success rate in producing programs with non-trivial safety guarantees against frozen specifications. Independent safety and functional evaluations further show strong performance across all three domains, while revealing failures when the auto-formalized semantics do not fully capture the target behavior.

Analytical performance models --- derivations of throughput or speedup from hardware parameters --- make claims independently verifiable and expose binding constraints, yet rarely accompany architecture papers because building one by hand takes weeks of expert effort. We present Rosetta, a multi-agent LLM pipeline that automatically generates first-principles analytical models from research paper PDFs. Given a paper as sole input, Rosetta produces a mathematical specification, an executable Python model, and a plain-English interpretation --- all autonomously, with zero human intervention. The formalization process itself is the primary value: it surfaces implicit assumptions and identifies missing parameters. Four design decisions address failure modes of naïve LLM-based generation: a scientific constitution that prohibits circular reasoning, verify-repair loops with independent critic agents, dual verification separating functional correctness from scientific validity, and a best-of-$N$ ensemble that exploits LLM stochasticity. We evaluate Rosetta across three complementary tracks: expert evaluation of 12 landmark papers (CS1), automated scoring of 97 unfiltered ISCA 2025 and HPCA 2026 papers (CS2), and author self-evaluation by six active research groups (CS3). Across CS1, specification quality scores 4--5/5 on 10 of 12 papers with zero significant hallucinations; across CS2, 56% of fit-screened papers reach Tier~A insight quality. The strongest finding comes from CS3: Rosetta's output led to revised claims and new experiments in active submissions, and five of six author-evaluators said they would use it again.

AI-mediated platforms coordinate work through LLM agents acting for different principals. In these workflows, privacy loss can be created before a final answer appears: a memory write, shared-workspace update, inter-agent message, or tool event may impose downstream exposure cost on another principal. We model this failure mode as a privacy-propagation externality, where the cost of a raw disclosure depends on topology and fanout as well as content. We present PAPC, a platform-mediated mechanism that intercepts information-moving events before they update shared state or external channels. PAPC combines policy, provenance, topology/fanout, privilege, and content signals to allow an event, release a policy-safe abstraction, quarantine raw content, block a transition, or narrow onward rights. The model explains why final-output control misses intermediate exposure costs and why high-fanout objects amplify propagation. Across retrieval-memory and multi-agent workflow benchmarks, PAPC preserves deterministic task completion and eliminates measured exact raw-value and external raw-value exposure. The results position event-level mediation as a platform-governance primitive for agent-mediated online work.

Robotic additive manufacturing (AM) extends material-extrusion printing beyond gantry kinematics but makes process planning robot-dependent. A slicer-generated plan that appears favorable in part coordinates can become infeasible or robotically unfavorable on a manipulator because slicer-process decisions and part orientation determine the generated path, while part orientation and workspace placement affect its kinematic realization. Existing AM tools, large language model (LLM)-based decision-support methods, and digital-shadow systems do not provide integrated pre-execution evaluation of these coupled decisions. This paper presents agentic robotic additive manufacturing (A-RAM), an agent-specialist-tool framework that converts user intent and a part file into traceable, execution-ready plans. The LLM interprets manufacturing objectives and constraints, identifies prescribed and searchable planning variables, and encodes this reasoning in a schema-constrained request; a deterministic Planning Agent instantiates the corresponding search workflow, while domain tools compute quantitative evidence for slicing, placement, inverse kinematics, trajectory timing, Joint-6 jerk, and extrusion. The framework is evaluated on a six-axis robotic-arm AM cell through three case studies covering expert-specified planning, goal-only planning, objective-dependent infill screening, and geometry-dependent orientation-placement selection. Across the evaluated candidate sets, selected plans achieve up to 53.5% lower maximum Joint-6 jerk and 48.3% lower mean absolute Joint-6 jerk than the least favorable valid candidates, while objective-specific infill screening yields motion-plan completion times up to 40.1% shorter and extrusion paths up to 12.7% shorter than the corresponding least favorable screened patterns.

Diffusion-based Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models achieve strong performance in embodied tasks, but their iterative sampling imposes heavy computational and memory-access cost, blocking real-time deployment on edge platforms. Existing acceleration methods either require expensive training (e.g., distillation, flow matching) or degrade perception via statically scheduled pruning and caching, ignoring the dynamic workload variance of robotic interactions. This paper presents FASA (Feedback-Aware Sampling Adaptation), a training-free runtime framework that treats real-time multimodal feedback as a control signal for the denoising pipeline: an interaction-driven range adaptor modulates the global sampling-step budget based on visual and gripper-force feedback, and a proprioception-aware step adaptor pinpoints the optimized step within the adapted range. This co-designed framework allows the underlying hardware architecture to adaptively match the workload demands of different execution phases. Comparative evaluations across several benchmarks show that the inference speed can be increased by up to 1.45$\times$ while maintaining competitive success rates, providing a novel dynamic runtime architecture paradigm for deploying heavy generative embodied AI workloads onto resource-constrained computing platforms.

Sparse tensor contractions are bottlenecked by sparse-sparse coiteration loops that resist standard loop vectorization. We present Splyce, an auto-vectorization framework in MLIR that overcomes this through a dual-path execution model. By decoupling coordinate intersection from pointer management via selective predication, Splyce inherently eliminates data-dependent branches as a side effect, allowing modern superscalar engines to maximize instruction-level parallelism and hide memory latency. Beyond simple branch elimination, our transformation exposes independent computation that can be executed concurrently, increasing functional-unit utilization that would otherwise be constrained by sequential dependencies. Evaluation across foundational sparse tensor kernels demonstrates performance ranging from 1.96X to 2.86X on synthetic inputs, with consistent speedups sustained across a vast majority of irregular real-world datasets from the SuiteSparse collection. Ultimately, Splyce demonstrates that by converting unpredictable control-flow into a predictable data stream, compiler-driven speculation can effectively reconcile the memory efficiency of compressed storage with the execution-unit throughput of modern superscalar architectures.

In this paper, we introduce layer-wise curriculum learning for efficient LLM compression. The proposed method facilitates the knowledge transfer from the teacher model to the student model, utilizing a curriculum learning approach that begins with easier optimization tasks and progressively tackles harder ones. In order to adopt the layer-wise learning in LLM compression, we partition the whole model into multiple segments consisting of layers, thereby enabling more computationally efficient knowledge transfer for LLMs. Based on our theoretical analysis of cumulative error phenomenon, layer-wise curriculum learning accelerates convergence while stabilizing the knowledge transfer process. In addition, we present a feature caching method with a multi-threading strategy to efficiently address feature misalignment across layers, maximizing GPU utilization. Consequently, our method exhibits advanced model compression performance, as well as high computational efficiency in terms of minimized memory usage and short training hours. Experiments on multiple datasets show that the proposed method achieves state-of-the-art performance while reducing GPU memory usage and training hours by more than 50% on BERT and GPT-2. Moreover, it outperforms the other pruning methods on LLaMA-family and Qwen models under the same training hours, with a lower GPU memory footprint.

World action models (WAMs) rely on video-generation backbones, requiring substantial memory and compute for deployment. Post-training quantization reduces memory and can accelerate inference, but bit width, grouping, and quantizer choice define a large configuration space. Identifying configurations that preserve task performance through exhaustive closed-loop evaluation is costly. We propose PreDE (Predict Before You Deploy), a policy-calibrated framework for predicting quantization-induced task degradation from offline action deviations. Using closed-loop outcomes from a small development set, PreDE calibrates two thresholds and accepts, rejects, or defers new configurations using a fixed observation log. Under a within-setting label-ordering hypothesis, the rule issues decisions where all thresholds consistent with the development labels agree. Across five WAMs and four benchmark settings, quantization produces configuration-dependent task losses that cannot be explained by bit width alone or a shared deviation threshold. Across 28 held-out configurations from two policies, PreDE issued 21 decisions before observing closed-loop outcomes (75% coverage), all matching the observed acceptable or degraded labels. Deferred candidates included both acceptable outcomes and a 33-percentage-point loss. In 450 Franka Research 3 trials across two independently fine-tuned policies, all configurations assigned to high-deviation groups before testing showed significant degradation, while low-deviation comparisons showed no statistically significant degradation. On the real robot, W4A4 achieved a 1.37x action-query speedup and approximately 44% lower peak memory. These results support policy-specific behavioral calibration for quantization configuration selection while identifying candidates that require closed-loop evaluation. The code is available at https://github.com/jiuyixu25/PreDE.

Autoregressive transformer decoding is constrained by irregular key-value (KV) cache movement on tiled accelerators. Prior compression and DRAM-placement systems still concentrate traffic on centralized memory paths that bottleneck long-context serving. We present MeshKV, a KV cache fabric that moves blocks as packetized flows over a lightweight NoC. It co-designs (i) TaKV affine striping to spread homes and cut hotspot load, (ii) Mare multicast with verified duplicate suppression, and (iii) Pad, which overlaps prefetch, tile multiply, and streaming softmax behind credit-aligned FIFOs. Together they convert bisection back-pressure into useful KV transfer. On our 8x8 FPGA implementation with LLaMA-2-7B and Mistral-7B at 8K-32K, MeshKV reduces interconnect traffic by up to 58%, improves KV bandwidth utilization by 2.1x, and delivers up to 1.9x multi-stream throughput.

Block diffusion language models (BDLMs) combine autoregressive dependencies across blocks with parallel denoising within blocks, but long-context training is constrained by distributed attention communication and activation memory. Conventional context parallelism (CP) shards the combined clean-plus-corrupted sequence by position, communicating shared clean K/V together with block-specific corrupted K/V and their gradients. We observe that the BDLM objective separates over target blocks. We introduce block parallelism (BP), a new distributed parallelism dimension that assigns each corrupted-block computation to one rank. To scale BP to long contexts, we introduce context-sharded block parallelism (CSBP), which also shards the shared clean sequence across those ranks. CSBP keeps corrupted K/V and gradients local, avoids replicated clean prefixes, and preserves BDLM training semantics. On 16 H200 GPUs at 256K context, CSBP improves throughput over the best baseline by 1.18-1.45x for supervised fine-tuning and 1.27-1.33x for conversion of autoregressive models to BDLMs, while matching or reducing peak HBM. Full-model speedup reaches 1.61x at 512K. On eight H100 GPUs, CSBP accelerates DFlash2 speculative-decoder training by 2.48x at 512K and 7.59x at 1M. In matched 12-hour DiffusionGemma 26B-A4B SFT runs, CSBP achieves higher pass rates at every trained checkpoint on SWE-bench Verified and Terminal-Bench Lite. Code: https://github.com/ScalingIntelligence/Turbo-dLLM

Bayesian Optimization (BO) is widely used for optimizing expensive black-box functions, yet many real-world optimization problems contain substantially richer information than function evaluations alone. Examples include training curves in hyperparameter optimization, expert notes and images in scientific experimentation, and prior knowledge about where optima may lie. We show that large language models (LLMs) can effectively leverage such rich auxiliary information to guide optimization. Motivated by these findings, we develop three methods for incorporating auxiliary information into BO using LLMs. Across hyperparameter optimization benchmarks and a real-world nuclear fusion optimization task, our methods consistently outperform both standard BO and existing LLM-based optimization approaches. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of LLMs for leveraging rich auxiliary information in BO.

Large Language Models (LLMs) have made remarkable progress in the processing and modeling of many languages. Yet, unlike human multilinguals, they exhibit surprisingly limited cross-lingual knowledge transfer. While this limitation is well documented, its origins during multilingual training remain unclear. We pretrain 360M- and 7B-parameter LLMs and show that poor cross-lingual knowledge generalization emerges during pretraining and persists under standard interventions. To isolate its cause, we employ a controlled bilingual pretraining setting using two copies of the same language, sharing identical text and token segmentation, but mapped to disjoint token spaces. We find that disjoint tokens alone are enough to induce knowledge compartmentalization, even between identical copies of the same language, establishing disjoint token spaces as a fundamental barrier to cross-lingual knowledge generalization. Guided by this understanding, we suggest mapping languages into a shared token space by simple word-wise translation and find it substantially improves cross-lingual knowledge generalization, recovering up to 12.6% of native-language learning efficiency --- 14$\times$ the baseline.

Modern LLMs and AI agents increasingly support data engineering workflows that integrate evidence from unstructured sources. Such pipelines typically do data retrieval, integration, and ranking before proceeding to more complex agentic reasoning or actions, e.g., for scientific discovery. The core retrieval problem in these workflows jointly executes multi-attribute filtering, multi-vector search, exact relational joins, and thresholded embedding-similarity joins. Given a planned query and monotone scoring function, our DASE query engine constructs and ranks candidate evidence tuples. It comprises (i) a multi-step reasoning query model over structured predicates, multiple vectors, and relational links; (ii) SemJI, a sparse materialized embedding-similarity join index for rare near-neighbor pairs; and (iii) a co-designed execution layer that combines predicate-aware ANN traversal, batched access, and threshold-based score aggregation. On scientific-discovery workloads, DASE retrieves candidate evidence for multi-step reasoning queries 6x to 46x faster than strong RDBMS, rerank, and vector-database baselines at comparable recall; and for tasks that require semantic-operator post-processing, DASE acts as a high-recall prefilter that makes downstream LLM evaluation both cheaper and more accurate — e.g., on SemBench E-Commerce it improves BigQuery quality from 0.67 to 0.80 while cutting cost from $2.42 to $0.54.

Systematic generalization, the ability to solve novel problems by recombining known atomic elements, is central to human intelligence but difficult to study rigorously under controlled settings. Existing studies therefore rely on simplifications such as approximately linear action composition, productivity-based tests, and action-explicit goals, which make systematic generalization easier to study but omit some essential aspects of this capability. To characterize what these simplifications miss, we adopt a reasoning-centered lens and introduce TranSGrid, a testbed that brings deductive, inductive, and abductive reasoning together within a unified task. Experiments with seven Transformers on 4,800 TranSGrid instances show that all models perform much worse on TranSGrid than on a held-out test set: the largest model solves 79.6% of the test set, but only 55.3% of TranSGrid and 15.8% of the hardest subset. The gap remains within the training length range, showing that productivity alone is not sufficient to evaluate systematic generalization. Additionally, we reintroduce the other two simplifications into TranSGrid: one variant makes actions compose almost linearly (reducing the inductive demand), the other makes goals action-explicit (reducing the abductive one). In both, solve rates return to roughly the test set level, showing that either simplification alone is enough to reduce TranSGrid to an ordinary held-out test set. Together, our results show that existing tasks reduce either or both of the inductive and abductive demands, and that comprehensively measuring systematic generalization requires a task that involves all three forms of reasoning.

Autonomous systems increasingly rely on Large Language Models (LLMs) yet the safety infrastructure surrounding these models introduces latency and compute overhead. This limits utility in resource-constrained, time-critical deployments. Existing external guardrail models remain blind to the model's internal workings, creating a fundamental assurance gap. We ask: does the model already know when the content is harmful? We extract activations from LLaMA-3.1-8B and train lightweight MLP classifier probes (12.6M parameters) to detect harmful prompts. Evaluated on WildJailbreak, Beavertails, and AEGIS 2.0, our probes achieve F1 scores of 99%, 83%, and 84%, respectively competitive with 1000x larger guard models while cutting latency and compute costs.

Test-time scaling can improve large language model reasoning by generating and combining multiple candidate responses. In sampling-based methods, the inference budget is often described by the number of generated candidates, N. However, N tells us how many candidates are generated, not how they are executed. The same candidate budget can be produced in one batched generation call or split across several sequential calls with smaller batch sizes. We first study the effect of increasing N on reasoning accuracy using Phi-3-mini and Qwen2.5-1.5B on 500 GSM8K prompts. As expected, increasing N from 1 to 8 improves accuracy by 8.4 percentage points for Phi-3-mini and 18.4 points for Qwen2.5-1.5B. However, accuracy alone does not show the systems cost of using a larger candidate budget. We therefore fix N = 8 and compare four generation schedules: 1x8, 2x4, 4x2, and 8x1, where axb denotes a generation calls with b candidates per call. We measure latency, throughput, GPU-hours, and gross GPU-device energy while keeping the total candidate count fixed. On A100 GPUs, eight serial calls use 4.64-4.86x as much gross GPU-device energy and have 5.77-6.12x the P95 latency of one batched call with eight candidates. The same pattern appears across three independently scheduled A100 nodes per model and in short-output SciQ/V100 experiments. These results show that candidate count alone is not enough to describe the systems cost of multi-candidate test-time scaling. When candidates are independent and memory allows it, fewer generation calls with larger batch sizes are more efficient. Evaluations should therefore report not only candidate count and accuracy, but also generation schedule and GPU-level systems metrics.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly adopted for compliance and legal reasoning tasks, yet their outputs often lack explicit grounding in legal logic and evidence. We present Code-as-Auditor, an LLM-based framework that extends the model's reasoning capability toward structured and evidence-grounded compliance assessment. The framework translates regulatory information into (1) formalized checklists and executable decision trees, encoding regulations and conditions as interpretable code structures. During inference, each checklist item is (2) dynamically expanded into factual and counterfactual questions, guiding the model to reason over case-specific evidence and potential violations. This process establishes a reasoning pipeline that proceeds from evidence identification, through rule application, to final decision-making, while a self-verification loop improves the logical consistency of the generated code and the traceability of outcomes. Experiments on privacy and data protection scenarios demonstrate that Code-as-Auditor delivers more accurate and evidence-backed evaluations, enabling automated compliance regulation checking grounded in explicit regulatory criteria.

Prior work has shown that internal harmfulness representations in large language models vary across risk categories, while sharing a common general harm representation component. This raises a question about the role of the category-specific component beyond general harm representation in LLM safety. To answer this question, we isolate the category-specific component by removing shared general harmfulness representation from each categorical harmfulness representation, yielding a category residual that is orthogonal to general harmfulness at every layer. Using activation steering with category residuals across 11 risk categories in 3 instruction-tuned LLMs, we find that whether category residuals encode harmfulness varies across categories, and that this category-wise pattern is similar across models. Whether category residuals induce refusal also varies across categories, but this category-wise pattern is more model-dependent. We also find that category residuals increase LLMs' downstream internal alignment with shared general harmfulness representation. Together, these findings demonstrate that more fine-grained category residuals should also be considered beyond shared general harmfulness representation to fully understand LLM safety. More broadly, our findings show that even a direction orthogonal to a concept at one layer can contribute to the concept's downstream amplification.

Multi-modal talking avatar synthesis aims to generate realistic talking videos from a reference portrait and speech. Despite rapid progress in diffusion-based methods, existing approaches still struggle to jointly achieve accurate lip articulation, human-preferred motion aesthetics, and efficient inference. We observe that phonetic accuracy and motion aesthetics arise from fundamentally different sources and should be addressed at complementary stages rather than learned implicitly by a single generator. Based on this insight, we propose VibeAvatar, which disentangles these two objectives through a Phonetic Kinematics Adapter (PKA) that converts recognition-oriented speech features into phonetic-kinematic conditions at the conditioning stage, and an Aesthetic Motion Policy (AMP) that optimizes a flow-consistent stochastic sampling policy via Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) at the post-training stage. With a lightweight flow-based motion generator operating in a compact 1D warp-based latent motion space, VibeAvatar achieves state-of-the-art results in articulation, aesthetics, and efficiency on both objective metrics and user studies, while generating a 10-second 512px video in under 10 seconds with only $\sim$3GB VRAM.

Large language models (LLMs) often suffer from capability stagnation in self-improvement training because fixed difficulty levels fail to adapt to their evolving proficiency. To address this issue, we propose STRETCH (Self-Taught Reasoning Evolution via Targeted CHallenge), a unified framework inspired by cognitive scaffolding theory. STRETCH introduces a dynamic Stretch Zone mechanism that continuously aligns question difficulty with the model's solving capability. Within a single parameter space, the model alternates between a Scaffolder that generates adaptive, boundary-pushing challenges and a Learner that that optimizes its solving trajectories through reinforcement learning. This dual-loop co-evolution effectively stabilizes training, mitigates reward hacking and promote progressive reasoning growth. Experiments on both negotiation and operation research benchmarks demonstrate that STRETCH consistently outperforms strong prompting and domain-specific baselines. Further scaffolder configuration analysis shows that dynamic difficulty alignment is critical for sustained capability improvement and synchronized reasoning evolution.

Streaming automatic speech recognition (ASR) must be judged jointly on what it transcribes and on how quickly it commits each word. Delayed streams modeling (DSM) has become the dominant paradigm for streaming large audio-language models, exposing a structural delay $τ$ that bounds the decoder's lookahead. We show that $τ$ is a poor proxy for user-perceived latency, and that the alignment-based supervision of DSM leaves latency on the table: the same forced-aligned transcript is used at every $τ$, forcing the model to withhold words it could already commit. We introduce AWED, a word-level emission-delay metric defined relative to the acoustic end of each word, and post-train a DSM recognizer with GRPO under a reward that scores transcription accuracy and measured delay jointly. Trained at a single operating point ($τ=6$ frames), our model dominates both its supervised fine-tuning initialization and the Voxtral Realtime backbone across all evaluated lookahead budgets: it cuts WER by 30.8% relative at an 80\,ms structural delay, and by 5.7% relative at 480\,ms while lowering median AWED from 1.17\,s to 1.04\,s. Latency-rewarded post-training thus advances the accuracy--latency Pareto frontier of streaming ASR without architectural change.

Offline on-policy distillation gains efficiency by collecting student trajectories and teacher supervision once and reusing them throughout optimization. The same reuse makes imperfect supervision persistent. Since even strong teachers can fail, we ask what remains learnable from imperfect teacher supervision? Teacher failure is only a coarse problem-level signal and does not imply that all supervision along the associated student trajectory is unhelpful. A natural alternative is to estimate teacher recoverability along the trajectory, but repeated continuations largely erase the efficiency advantage of offline distillation. We instead use teacher-successful problems to define a cheap reference for what the student can learn. We train on teacher-successful problems and measure how the likelihood of each observed token in trajectories from teacher-failed problems changes. We use these signed likelihood changes as an operational learnability signal: larger increases indicate behavior more strongly promoted by successful-only learning. We aggregate this signal into trajectory-level weights for the original distillation loss. Unlike continuation-based estimates, our learnability requires no additional generation and can be computed once from stored trajectories and model checkpoints. Across mathematical reasoning and code generation, our method improves an offline OPD baseline by up to 2.7 percentage points and matches or outperforms online OPD variants on multiple benchmarks. Despite the additional successful-only distillation stage, it uses 2 GPUs and about 22 GPU hours, compared with 3 GPUs and 36--48 GPU hours for representative online OPD methods.

One-step action generation can substantially reduce the inference cost of vision-language-action (VLA) policies, but its effect on closed-loop task success remains an open question. This technical report studies a GR00T N1.7 variant in which the iterative diffusion-transformer action head is replaced by a one-step drifting action head, together with an overlap-conditioned extension for asynchronous chunk replacement. All multi-seed drifting runs were trained on two NVIDIA A800 GPUs. On LIBERO, the action head reduces the mean model-forward time of the action head from approximately $45.3\,\mathrm{ms}$ to $5.0\,\mathrm{ms}$, while the measured backbone-plus-head time falls from approximately $70.0\,\mathrm{ms}$ to $30.6\,\mathrm{ms}$. However, this speedup is accompanied by a systematic reduction in task success. Across three drifting seeds, success is $64.0\pm4.0%$ on LIBERO-Spatial, $52.0\pm1.0%$ on LIBERO-Goal, and $26.0\pm2.6%$ on LIBERO-Long. The low seed variance indicates that the degradation is not explained by random initialization alone. We report the result as a speed--success trade-off rather than an overall improvement, and discuss likely contributing factors including deterministic one-step mode averaging, batch-dependent geometry estimation, long open-loop chunk execution, and the fact that synchronous LIBERO evaluation does not exercise the asynchronous overlap path.

"What I cannot create, I do not understand."Human wisdom reveals that creation is one of the highest forms of learning. For example, Diffusion Models have demonstrated remarkable semantic structure and memory in image generation, understanding, and restoration, which intuitively benefits representation learning. However, current gait networks rarely embrace this perspective, relying primarily on learning by contrasting gait samples under varying complex conditions, leading to semantic inconsistency and uniformity issues. To address these issues, we propose Origins with generative capabilities whose underlying philosophy is that different entities are generated from a unified template, inherently regularizing gait representations within a consistent and diverse semantic space to capture accurate gait differences. Admittedly, learning this unified template is exceedingly challenging, as it requires the comprehensiveness of the template to encompass gait representations with various conditions. Inspired by Diffusion Models, Origins diffuses the unified template into timestep templates for gait generative learning, and meanwhile transfers the unified template for gait representation learning. Especially, gait generative and representation learning serve as a unified framework for end-to-end joint training. Extensive experiments on CASIA-B, CCPG,SUSTech1K, Gait3D, GREW and CCGR-MINI demonstrate that Origins performs unified generative and representation learning, achieving superior performance.

World models can anticipate the consequences of navigation actions, but predicted action sequences may become invalid during execution, especially when wheel-legged robots encounter dynamic obstacles or change locomotion modes. We propose WAVE-Go, an image-goal navigation framework that separates world-action prediction from interruptible command execution. Its executor adaptively selects an action prefix and cancels pending commands when updated observations invalidate execution. A conditional-risk formulation specifies prefix selection under an estimated cumulative failure budget, while posture and locomotion-mode transitions require clearance, stability, and task-evidence checks. In the reported navigation evaluation, WAVE-Go achieves 74.1% in-distribution success and 63.3% dynamic out-of-distribution success, exceeding the strongest baseline by 4.7 and 7.7 percentage points, respectively, while reducing collisions from 4.4 to 2.9 per 100 m. Compared with interruptible fixed four-command execution, WAVE-Go raises success by 4.0 percentage points while reducing replanning frequency by 51.2% and collision rate by 6.5%. Execution ablations also show that runtime interruption improves success, collision rate, and reaction latency at the cost of additional replanning. These results support adaptive, interruptible execution as a means of balancing navigation performance and planning overhead. Code is available at https://github.com/vigorlee/wave-go.