每天知道
你的领域
出了什么

Large language model optimization is an active research area, spanning quantization of model weights, early-exit methods for skipping layers, and speculative decoding. Each track uses its own quality measures, typically an idiosyncratic benchmark score. Few approach the measurement precision required by other scientific disciplines. We propose a rigorous methodology for measuring output quality, suitable for cross-system and cross-technique comparison. We score outputs with an LLM as a judge, but calibrate the judge formally: we compare its scores on two ordinary runs of a model given the same prompts, verifying that it shows no systematic preference between statistically equivalent outputs and measuring its per-sample noise. Each design also includes a 'null' condition, provably identical in distribution to the unmodified model, whose measured difference must be zero. With this one instrument we measure several acceleration techniques on the same prompts, so their quality costs can be compared. Perceived quality proves highly dependent on the domain of discourse. A 4-bit model was indistinguishable from its 16-bit original down to our design's +/-0.3-point resolution, in English prose and Chinese alike. At 3-bit precision the same prompts lost 0.5 points in English prose, 0.9 in Chinese, and 1.1 on multi-step math; early exit that cost 0.7 points on prose cost 2.5 on math, cutting correctly solved problems from 19 of 27 to 6. The pattern held for models from Alibaba and from Meta, but not its magnitude: the same quantizer cost Meta's model 1.8 points where it cost Alibaba's 0.7. A model's certainty about a token predicts how likely it is to differ from the full model's choice, but not how much that difference affects judged quality, so acceptance rules relying on certainty cannot distinguish errors that matter from errors that don't.

Large language model agents tune GPU kernels and serving engines through a closed loop of propose, measure, and keep, but the measurements behind this loop are not trustworthy. We characterize four failure modes from a four-day pilot corpus of 619 model calls: strawman baselines manufacture speedups, absolute times do not transfer across machines, saturated tasks nullify comparisons, and infrastructure defects impersonate science. We present AutoTuneBench, a benchmark and measurement protocol that makes trust architectural. The protocol is frozen as code with test-enforced provenance; a database-level validator rejects out-of-protocol results; anti-cheat checks run outside the agent's modification surface; comparisons follow pre-registered readouts; and measurements anchor to externally published results, grounded in paired-seed statistics with a 5% cross-run coefficient-of-variation cap. Honest measurement rewrites the headlines: our best kernel reads 10.6x against a naive baseline but 2.03x against the honest one; one configuration delivers 1.174x on one machine and 1.0049x on another; a pre-registered on/off comparison nulls at a shared wall (2.4840 vs 2.4957\,ms); and the KernelBench Level-1 suite admits 51% of tasks with median speedup 1.0001x over PyTorch eager. The protocol, the two-engine corpus (vLLM and SGLang), and its audit trail are released as open artifacts.

Frontier open-weight language models increasingly use Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures to expand model capacity while activating only a small subset of experts per token. Local inference must nevertheless keep the complete expert pool available, which remains far beyond consumer-grade RAM and VRAM capacity even after quantization. SSDs provide practical capacity at this scale, but turning that capacity into executable model memory requires efficient expert delivery, coordinated management of SSD, RAM, and VRAM, and CPU--GPU hybrid execution under bounded bandwidth. We present SSD-LLaMA, an SSD-native local MoE inference system that addresses these challenges with an SSD I/O pipeline optimized for expert delivery, a native three-tier storage hierarchy that delivers and retains experts dynamically, and balanced CPU--GPU hybrid execution. SSD-LLaMA executes every selected expert without pruning or substitution. Across three frontier MoE model families, SSD-LLaMA improves prefill token rate by 1.52$\times$--4.19$\times$ and decode token rate by 2.10$\times$--15.58$\times$ over the evaluated baselines. We also achieve higher than 1 token/s for running trillion-parameter model with a single RTX 5090 and no more than 32GB RAM.

An agentic request spends substantial wall-clock time waiting for tools, and its KV cache holds GPU memory the whole time. Serving systems decide whether that cache stays, leaves, or comes back by guessing how long the tool will run, from the tool's name, its history, a duration declared before the call, or the engine's own occupancy. We show that no estimate fixed before a call starts can know its duration, and such estimates may not even rank the calls. Meanwhile, the running tool already holds the answer, but the agent stack together with the tool silences it. We propose that tool calls report their progress explicitly while they run, and we measure what that takes. A census of four public agent corpora finds a readable signal in most tool time once it is revealed, in two strengths: a fraction of the work remaining, or an accurate signal that the end is near. A harness recovers it without changing what the agent sees, at no measurable cost to the agent's benchmark score. At the points where a KV cache decision is made, the reported progress is between several times and an order of magnitude more accurate than the best published predictors, and it stays accurate when the environment changes. Plugged into a production engine through a few small hints, it cuts the p90 time to first token (TTFT) after a tool call by 20.7% (HBM only) and 20.8% (HBM + DRAM) against LRU, close to an oracle. A serving system should not guess what its tools can tell it.

Mixture-of-experts (MoE) inference on consumer hardware is bounded by weight memory: a 35B-class model is 19.5GB at 4-bit, and sparsity shrinks the compute per token, not the bytes that must be held. Naive offloading to SSD does not help on its own, because layer N+1's experts must be chosen before layer N's output exists, so the reads cannot start early enough to hide behind compute. We present Edge0, a streaming MoE inference engine that closes the gap with a prerouter: a per-layer head predicts the next layer's routing one token ahead, and the prediction is consumed as the routing itself, so the staged expert set equals the routed set and nothing is dropped. An unmerged recovery LoRA, trained on the student path, pays back the quality lost to int4 quantization and routing replacement. On a single 24GB machine, Edge0 serves a 35B MoE at 20tok/s inside 3GiB of peak active memory, within a few points of its fp16 teacher on average across five public benchmarks. An 8B tier runs on the same framework, and the framework, checkpoints, and adapters are open source.

Large language models (LLMs) require increasing memory capacity to accommodate growing model weights and KV caches. High-Bandwidth Flash (HBF) offers high memory density and aggregate read bandwidth through massive plane-level parallelism, making it an attractive option for LLM serving. However, serving LLMs entirely from HBF introduces three challenges: fine-grained KV reads create placement and access imbalance, incremental writes interfere with foreground reads, and mixed KV lifetimes amplify garbage collection. Hybrid HBM/HBF designs retain HBM to support dynamic KV management, but this allocation reduces the HBF resources available under a fixed packaging budget, limiting aggregate HBF bandwidth. We present HBFlex, a full-HBF memory system with coordinated optimizations for KV reads, writes, and reclamation. HBFlex balances KV placement and attention accesses to improve plane utilization. It aggregates incremental updates and schedules writeback within sufficiently long compute windows to reduce write--read interference. It also combines lifetime-guided block packing with deferred reclamation to reduce valid-page migration. We evaluate HBFlex through trace-driven simulation across different configurations. HBFlex achieves average throughput speedups of up to 1.58$\times$ over FlashAccel and 3.30$\times$ over H3, benefiting from higher HBF bandwidth and more efficient management of dynamic KV-cache reads, writes, and erases.

LLM serving is typically offered as a shared, multi-tenant service, where high-demand workloads from one client can cause latency SLO violations for others. Existing solutions for performance isolation equalize client throughput in the long run, for example through queueing and batching fairness. However, these approaches do not provide latency isolation guarantees; as a result, well-behaved clients can still experience significant degradation to their token-level latencies. In this paper, we present FairInference, which provides the novel δ-token fairness guarantee: for a well-behaved client, if a token is generated in d time units in isolation, it will be generated within d + δ time units in multi-tenant execution, providing strong latency isolation guarantees for LLM serving. To achieve this, FairInference addresses a key challenge of LLM serving: bounding delays from sharing GPU resources without support for fine-grained scheduling or resource allocation. In FairInference, the scheduler enforces per-token deadlines, while bounding the delays from GPU compute sharing and accounting for the additional delays introduced by the shared KV caching in GPU memory. We show that FairInference effectively bounds token-level latency spikes for well-behaved clients and improves overall throughput compared to state-of-the-art LLM serving systems.

Long-context LLM inference is bottlenecked by attention, whose repeated KV-cache reads make decoding memory-bound. Self-speculative decoding alleviates this by drafting tokens with sparse attention and verifying them with full attention, but existing batched methods remain synchronized: all requests in a batch share a single draft-verify schedule, even though the optimal draft length varies widely across requests and changes dynamically within each request. We propose ASPIRE, a non-synchronized batched self-speculative decoding framework built on three components. First, a unified mixed forward allows drafting and verifying requests to coexist in the same batched forward pass, removing the need for global draft-verify phases. Second, a lightweight online speculation scheduler uses per-request acceptance-rate estimates and a batch-aware cost model to let each request independently choose when to verify. Third, an intra-draft refresh layer performs full attention at a single designated layer during drafting, updating the sparse context at every draft step to reduce staleness during drafting. Across three models and five reasoning and long-context benchmarks, ASPIRE achieves $1.70$-$4.58\times$ speedup in decoding throughput over autoregressive baselines and improves average speedup by approximately $27%$ over the strongest prior self-speculative baselines.

Recent Omni-Modal Generative Models (Omni-Models) have advanced content generation toward unified modeling of text, images, video, and audio. MiniMax-H3 exemplifies this transition by combining multimodal context understanding with joint audio-visual generation in a shared latent framework. Its unified architecture raises a fundamental question: Can multimodal alignment improve the model's world reasoning, and what new evaluation paradigms do omni-modal inputs enable? To investigate this question, this work introduces a comprehensive evaluation framework organized around four complementary dimensions of physical world reasoning. Unlike existing evaluation frameworks for video generation and world models, which are often constrained by limited input modalities and evaluation settings where prompts closely match the target video content, our evaluation is specifically designed to exploit the multimodal inputs of Omni-Model. We construct a diverse set of novel tasks that require models to integrate complementary information across modalities. Specifically, we consider four scenarios, including implicit prompts paired with multiple frames, audio-image, prefix-videos, and audio-video inputs. Every single modality provides only partial evidence about the underlying event, requiring the model to jointly reason over the complementary semantic cues to infer latent event states and future dynamics. Across 517 evaluation instances, MiniMax-H3 achieves an overall success rate of 41.97%. Video-based Decision Reasoning yields the highest success rate at 56.00%, while Audio-based Disambiguation Reasoning is the weakest, reaching only 27.40%. These results indicate that effective multimodal integration remains key to fully exploiting the benefits of diverse input modalities. The project is available at https://github.com/gulucaptain/MiniMax-H3-Reason.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are now routinely trained using synthetic data, since high-quality human data has been exhausted by the ever increasing needs of larger and larger models. However, recursive training on synthetic data frequently induces model collapse, a degenerative feedback loop where models progressively forget the true underlying data distribution. Training on a mixture of synthetic and fresh human data is a logical countermeasure and can prevent model collapse. However, it is an open question as to what is the exact minimum required ratio of human-to-synthetic data to maintain training stability. In this paper, we establish rigorous theoretical guarantees on the minimum rate of human data required to prevent model collapse. Although previous work established a formal lower bound for this ratio, such bound can be vacuous for very high dimensions, as the analysis relies on the usual Euclidean metric in R^n and is not adapted to the space of categorical probability distributions. Instead, in this paper we explicitly leverage the information-geometric structure of the probability simplex by analyzing the dynamics of the process under the Fisher-Rao metric. We derive quantitative contraction and invariance bounds that are stable and do not become trivial as the dimensions increase. Thus, we show that the effective required data ratio to prevent model collapse is different than previously implied.

Private large language model (LLM) fine-tuning is increasingly important for organizations that need to adapt models using sensitive data, but it often exceeds the memory capacity of commodity datacenter accelerators. Apple Silicon offers a different design point through large unified memory and lower complete-system cost, while recent Apple software support enables distributed execution over RDMA-over-Thunderbolt (TB). This paper studies whether Apple Silicon can serve as a practical platform for private LLM fine-tuning. We characterize RDMA-over-TB communication on Mac Studio nodes, showing that the measured bandwidth is far below nominal TB specifications. Next, we extend Apple's implementation with multi-trunk communication, persistent worker threads, and CPU-side gradient overlap to better exploit multiple direct TB links for LLM fine-tuning workloads. Finally, on a four-node Mac Studio cluster that fine-tunes a Qwen3-9B, our optimizations improve weak-scaling throughput by up to 1.6X over the single-trunk, non-overlapped baseline and reach 936 tokens/s for sequence length 17408. We further compare Apple Silicon with an NVIDIA H100 platform to quantify the trade-off between memory capacity, throughput, and acquisition cost, showing that Apple Silicon can provide a cost-effective solution for private LLM fine-tuning.

Organizations increasingly use oversight loops where one large language model (LLM) audits another's outputs alongside procedural traces of claimed steps. A common concern about such LLM-as-a-judge pipelines is that detailed traces make overseers gullible. Using signal detection theory, we audit five LLM overseers on 19 compliance tasks (4,551 analyzed judgments), varying only trace detail and evidence labeling. With disconfirming evidence always visible, error detection remains near ceiling. Instead, elaborate traces shift the decision criterion toward rejection, increasing false alarms in susceptible overseers. Without option labels, human-validated reason coding shows about 60% of false alarms cite an inability to tie evidence to its option. Labels eliminate this stated reason, yet residual rejection of correct work persists in those overseers and rises with trace detail. Procedural traces thus act as governance artifacts that shape oversight decisions. AI auditors should be evaluated by their decision criterion and false-alarm behavior, alongside accuracy.

Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly tackle long-horizon tasks through multi-step environment interaction, yet a single erroneous action can alter subsequent states and observations, causing errors to compound over time. Existing methods either correct the context without repairing altered environment states or restore earlier states while discarding useful experience, making it difficult to both eliminate failure conditions and avoid repeating past mistakes. We argue that reliable recovery should instead be treated as a rollback-boundary control problem that jointly determines when to intervene, where to resume, and what information should survive recovery. Based on this view, we propose Rollback-Induced Reflection (RIR), a unified recovery framework that restores execution to a selected prior state while carrying forward reusable knowledge distilled from the abandoned trajectory to guide subsequent decisions. We further characterize recovery through a unified operator over rollback depth and retained memory, providing a general view of state restoration and knowledge retention. Experiments on three long-horizon benchmarks show that RIR consistently improves average task performance across multiple LLM backbones, with structured reflection memory preserving useful experience and selective rollback enabling efficient recovery.

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) exhibit strong problem-solving abilities, yet their safety alignment often degrades when handling harmful queries. Existing approaches to improving safety largely rely on additional training or preference optimization, while offering limited understanding of the internal mechanisms behind safety failures. In this work, we investigate this failure through a token-level positional analysis of refusal dynamics and identify a localized vulnerability at the onset of reasoning, which we term Onset Refusal Collapse (ORC). We find that the refusal-related signal of LRMs drops sharply at the first generated token under harmful queries, which is associated with unsafe response generation. Motivated by this finding, we propose SafeToken, a lightweight inference-time intervention that injects a learned continuous safety anchor precisely at reasoning onset. Despite updating only a single token embedding, SafeToken effectively mitigates ORC, improves safety on harmful-query benchmarks, and largely preserves reasoning utility. These results suggest that safety failures in LRMs can arise from a transient breakdown at the critical transition from understanding to generation.

Poor indoor air quality can cause up to five times more direct health problems to occupants than outdoor air. In particular, it may cause headaches, fatigue, eye/throat irritation, and long-time exposure is linked to respiratory and heart as well as some forms of cancer. Despite the importance of indoor health and well-being, most current monitoring devices and systems (usually for offices and workspaces) are passive. The Environmental Quality Monitor (EnQyMo) platform is a generic Internet of Things (IoT) middleware designed to process several sensor data related to air quality in indoor spaces and correlate this data with health exposure risks of users/workplace employees. Using Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) beacons and a mobile IoT middleware it is able to identify the (smartphone) users exposed to these polluted air or high CO2 (carbon dioxide) levels, and generate location-specific alarms only to the users at the places with the unhealthy air conditions. At the core of EnQyMo is an agency of Large Language Models (LLMs) capable of interpreting regulatory standards and scientific literature to automatically identify critical health exposure levels.

This study empirically evaluates whether cost-efficient Large Language Models (LLMs) can be trusted to generate enterprise code to a written specification. Three models (Gemini Flash 3, GPT-5.4 mini and Claude Haiku 4.5) were asked to solve 992 algorithmic problems as Java Spring Boot service methods conforming to a mandated signature and data-transfer-object specification, crossing four model and agentic coding tool combinations with two prompt variants to yield eight configurations, with iteration forbidden and hardcoded answers explicitly prohibited. Eight problem statements were withheld to probe how models respond to missing input. The 7,593 resulting methods were classified by an eight-class outcome taxonomy describing what each does about producing an answer, then deployed and executed, giving 7,936 measured requests joined to that classification. Structural conformance approached ceiling, yet 38.4% of methods do not compute the value they returned and only 12.9% of returned answers were correct. Conditioning on outcome class shows that response reliability and correctness are inversely related, whereas genuinely computing methods answered least often and were correct 19.3%. Limitations include single generation runs per configuration, partial harness coverage, single-pass timing, syntactic classification, and probable corpus contamination.

We report the results of a Turing Test conducted in Finland in the Finnish language. Because languages and cultural contexts are unevenly represented in LLM training data, we expected the model (ChatGPT 5.2) to perform worse in a Finnish-language Turing Test than in previously studied English-language US contexts. We also present model-generated role prompting as a replicable technique for conducting comparative LLM-based Turing Tests designed to improve construct validity. Contrary to our expectations, the LLM passed the Finnish Turing Test. A prominent source of error was participants' reliance on linguistic cues, particularly colloquial Finnish, as markers of human authorship. We reframe the Turing Test from a test of intelligence to a comparative method for examining whether an AI system can display credible membership in a particular social world. Because its outcome reflects model capabilities, prompted identity, insider competence among human participants, and their AI literacy, the method provides a useful probe of the human-machine boundary across domains.

Personalized agents are required to reason over long-term history interactions to infer both explicit preferences and implicit behavioral evidence. While early flat retrieval methods score memory fragments independently and neglect the distributed information, current structured memory frameworks rely on query-agnostic static graphs that fail to capture the context-dependent relations. Crucially, raw textual memories are inherently entangled and noisy, making fine-grained personalization and cross-session reasoning computationally prohibitive. To this end, we present LGM, a novel neuro-symbolic framework that shifts long-term memory disentanglement into a continuous latent space. Specifically, (i) instead of persisting fixed graphs, we design a tailored latent graph construction with a sparse autoencoder. Subject to each query, it maps historical interactions into latent memory nodes and disentangles the memory traces into sparse concept activations, dynamically synthesizing query-aware relational edge weights. (ii) A graph encoder then treats the query embedding as a conditioning preference to direct non-linear message passing across the task-specific latent subgraph. This yields a highly expressive memory representation for effective activations. Extensive experiments on long-term personalization benchmarks demonstrate that LGM significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in capturing both explicit and implicit preferences while enabling personalized responses.

Large language models (LLM) deployed as autonomous pricing agents may sustain supracompetitive prices through tacit coordination. We develop a causal graph divergence framework that separately measures structural faithfulness and intent faithfulness of LLM pricing agents in Bertrand competition. Across nine LLMs under duopoly and triopoly conditions, collusive behavior and chain-of-thought (CoT) faithfulness dissociate along both dimensions: the most collusive model accurately reports cooperative intent yet reasons structurally unfaithfully, while the most structurally faithful model sustains supra-Nash pricing under both market structures. These findings establish that CoT monitoring alone cannot serve as a standalone safeguard against algorithmic collusion.

Large language models are increasingly used to generate and evaluate online content, yet it remains unclear whether the qualities they associate with higher engagement match what real users respond to. We study this question using 1.17 million answers to 25,978 questions from Zhihu, Quora, and Reddit, comparing real platform answers and AI-generated answers across four within-question engagement levels. We introduce Ontological Preference Measurement, which represents answers along three dimensions: logic, affect, and expression. We find a systematic gap between AI preference and real user engagement: as target engagement increases, LLMs add more explicit logical structure, while real user engagement is more strongly associated with affective and expressive salience. We call this tendency logic overbinding. Based on this diagnosis, we propose Ontology-Masked Reasoning Autoencoding (OMRA), a controlled intervention that masks and reconstructs over-explained spans while preserving stance, factual content, and coherence. Across four LLM families, OMRA reduces the measured gap by an average of 54.4%. In human evaluation, OMRA wins 62.4% of pairwise preference judgments against matched real platform answers, even though the real answers are more often judged to be human-written.

Bridging the gap between human intent and machine execution remains a challenge in automated planning, where expressing goals in formal languages like PDDL restricts accessibility to non-experts. This paper empirically evaluates whether current Large Language Models (LLMs) can reliably translate natural language testing goals, written in informal language by video game testers, into well-formed PDDL targets suitable for classical planning. We present a carefully designed prompt template, integrating insights from iterative experimentation, aimed at maximizing both accuracy and response coherence from multiple state-of-the-art LLMs. Six contemporary models are systematically assessed on correctness, speed, and error tendencies using real-world, domain-specific benchmarks. All models demonstrate high correctness, exceeding 92%, with Gemini 2.5 Flash achieving the highest accuracy at 96% and the lowest incidence of false positives, while GPT-4.1 leads in response speed. Despite these advances, critical distinctions exist in model performance, and occasional failures arise from language ambiguity and limitations in domain representation. Our analysis underscores both the significant progress and ongoing gaps in enabling LLMs to act as robust bridges between natural language objectives and automated planning pipelines.

Scaling laws hold that language models grow more capable with more parameters and more training data. Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) architectures are a remarkable demonstration of these laws, activating only a fraction of an enormous parameter bank for each token. But this success is built on static pretraining data --- the facts and corrections supplied by users during live interactions are a significant untapped source of potential improvement for a deployed model, but cannot be exploited by conventional architectures whose weights are frozen after training. Instead, this newfound knowledge must be placed in the context (by instruction or retrieval) and re-read on every request, only to be discarded afterwards. We seek instead to learn from live interactions by dynamically updating model weights. Inspired by MoEs, we propose the Infinite-Parameter LLM. A compact hypernetwork turns the online data into low-rank modulations of a shared base network, so feed-forward weights are generated from live data, not read from static memory. Whereas existing weight generators are held fixed after reading the context once, we form a Bayesian belief over the generator's latent state and update it online, such that the effective weights are re-derived as our belief evolves during the session. Although the model's memory footprint is constant, the feasible space of generated weights is thus effectively infinite. Representing live data in the weights rather than the prompt amortises compute, frees the context window, persists updates across turns, and can generalise better than in-context use. Our evaluation protocol applies this methodology to in-context learning and retrieval.

Direct preference alignment methods are widely used to align large language models (LLMs) with human preferences because of their computational and memory efficiency. However, likelihood displacement motivates alternative ways to extract information from preference pairs with small likelihood margins. In this paper, we propose and analyze Comparison-based Preference Optimization (ComPO), a zeroth-order alignment method based on comparison oracles. ComPO extracts directional information from these pairs without directly optimizing a differentiable preference loss on them. We establish a convergence guarantee for its basic offline scheme under smoothness, gradient sparsity, and compatibility between the oracle and a latent objective. We further introduce online ComPO, which retains the offline comparison mechanism and uses unlabeled policy generations for reverse-KL control relative to a reference policy. Following the coverage perspective of preference fine-tuning, we establish a performance guarantee for a basic constrained scheme under local coverage and in-distribution pairwise reward accuracy. Experiments on Mistral, Llama, Gemma-2, Qwen3, and Gemma-3 models demonstrate improvements over existing direct alignment methods, including length-controlled win rates, with pair-level diagnostics providing evidence consistent with mitigating likelihood displacement.

We introduce Mahalanobis-Ensemble Decoding (ME-Decoding), a novel Large Language Model (LLM) decoding framework that frames candidate token selection as ensemble pruning. Existing selection strategies rely predominantly on scalar probabilities, ignoring geometric semantic relationships and causing candidate redundancy. Meanwhile, current geometry-aware methods often require complex optimization or directly reweighting the original token probabilities, leading to significant computational overhead or inference instability. To address this, we formulate decoding as a subset optimization problem using a Mahalanobis distance-driven objective to enhance semantic diversity while preserving high probabilities. Specifically, we dynamically discount redundant generation paths using a token similarity matrix, constructed via an adaptive-bandwidth kernel over token embeddings. We further devise an efficient greedy selection algorithm with near-linear complexity in the candidate size under early stopping, while establishing its theoretical approximation guarantees. This renders ME-Decoding a robust, plug-and-play module with negligible inference overhead. Extensive experiments across diverse reasoning and generation tasks demonstrate that our method consistently achieves strong performance.

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-stakes domains such as housing screening. While alignment techniques mitigate explicit racial bias in generated text, they often leave covert attitudinal associations in internal probability distributions untouched. Adapting the matched-guise sociolinguistic paradigm, we examine covert dialect bias in housing-related social judgments across four varieties: Standard American English (SAE), African American Vernacular English (AAVE), Nigerian Standard English (NSE), and Nigerian Pidgin (NP). AAVE reflects the racialized dialect studied in prior covert-bias evaluations, whereas NSE and NP represent Black African, postcolonial varieties absent from this literature. Using 260 meaning-matched sentence quadruples and log-probability scoring over housing-relevant adjectives, we probe ten open-weight LLMs across three contexts varying in social proximity: tenant screening, neighbor acceptance, and roommate selection. Across all ten models, AAVE and NP are consistently associated with more negative adjectives than SAE, with NP penalized most severely. Crucially, each dialect is penalized via distinct stereotype clusters rather than a generic non-standard category. NSE, which carries institutional prestige, displays a context-dependent shift: favored over SAE in formal tenant screening but increasingly penalized as social proximity grows. Our findings reveal that LLMs inherit covert dialect bias along both racial identity and prestige dimensions, echoing documented human housing discrimination and demonstrating its reach across postcolonial English varieties.

Large Language Models (LLMs) frequently exhibit hallucinations, presenting a major barrier to reliability in complex reasoning tasks. While traditional detection methods rely on output-based confidence metrics, these logits are often miscalibrated by modern alignment techniques. In this paper, we investigate the temporal volatility of internal attention mechanisms as an alternative diagnostic signal for hallucination that does not depend on output calibration. By introducing an unsupervised metric for attention dispersion, we show that epistemic uncertainty leaves a measurable trace within intermediate layers, where spikes in attention entropy are associated with reasoning breakdowns. We evaluate our approach on mathematical reasoning benchmarks (GSM8K and MATH-500) using the Qwen2.5 model family (1.5B and 3B parameters), finding statistically significant AUC improvements of up to +0.076 over output-based baselines across all tested conditions. These findings suggest that attention dispersion is a promising complement to traditional hallucination detection methods, requiring further investigation across broader model families and task domains.

Pathology vision-language models are commonly built by pretraining or fine-tuning large encoders on paired image-caption data. We asked whether a pathology vision-language model can instead be assembled by parameter-efficient alignment of frozen unimodal foundation models, leaving their pretrained representations untouched. Here we present Lumen, which aligns frozen Virchow2 and BioMedBERT backbones using rank-4 adapters and projection heads, training only 0.40% of the total parameters on the public QUILT-1M corpus. Across nine public zero-shot patch benchmarks, Lumen achieved the highest mean chance-corrected balanced accuracy, 0.546 versus 0.461 for the strongest baseline (paired difference 0.086, 95% CI 0.042-0.136). On lymph-node metastasis detection, Lumen reached an AUROC of 0.964 (95% CI 0.956-0.971) on 4,214 held-out internal slides and 0.955 (95% CI 0.942-0.966) on 2,368 slides across nine external cohorts and six organs. At the internally calibrated threshold, it outperformed all vision-language baselines, with a balanced accuracy of 0.909 (95% CI 0.896-0.923) internally and 0.915 (95% CI 0.902-0.929) externally. Lumen performed competitively across the evaluations, with the exception of cross-modal retrieval, where it ranked third behind CONCH and PathGen-L/14. Fully fine-tuning both encoders gave Lumen no consistent benefit over low-rank adaptation, although it improved retrieval. Aligning frozen unimodal foundation models therefore yields strong and transferable performance at patch and slide level while training only a small fraction of the parameters.

Learning from human feedback has become a central paradigm for training modern AI systems, where models of human utility are used as reward models in policy learning. Existing methods typically assume a universal utility function shared across a population and treat disagreement between annotators as stochastic variation. While suitable for objective tasks, this assumption breaks down in subjective domains where preferences vary systematically across individuals. We study the problem of subjective preference learning, in which observed choices arise from heterogeneous but internally consistent utility functions. Drawing upon rational choice theory, RCT \parencite{tversky1981framing}, we introduce individuated utility functions conditioned on both the individual and their decision context, and propose a novel multi-stage architecture for estimating them from multi-modal data. We evaluate our framework on a newly collected dataset of more than $575{,}000$ pairwise aesthetic judgments from $2{,}398$ participants comparing automotive wheel designs. Our experiments show that individuated utility models substantially outperform universal utility models including foundation model baselines. Our results demonstrate that disagreement reflects meaningful preference heterogeneity rather than annotation noise. More broadly, our findings highlight the importance of collecting annotator attributes and learning individuated utility functions, enabling reward models that explicitly account for whose preferences they represent and faithfully capture human decision diversity.

This thesis develops robust and efficient AI frameworks for accelerating crystalline materials discovery by addressing both major stages of the materials-design pipeline: crystal property prediction and crystal structure generation. Motivated by the high computational cost of Density Functional Theory (DFT) and the limited availability of labeled materials data, the thesis explores graph representation learning, pretraining, multimodal learning, and generative modeling for scalable materials design. For property prediction, the thesis first introduces CrysXPP, which learns transferable crystal representations through unsupervised graph autoencoding, reducing dependence on large property-labeled datasets. It then proposes CrysGNN, a large-scale self-supervised graph pretraining framework that captures atomic connectivity, chemical attributes, and global structural information and transfers this knowledge to downstream property predictors through knowledge distillation. CrysMMNet further enriches crystal representations by jointly modeling graph structure and textual descriptions, thereby incorporating both local chemical and global structural knowledge. For crystal generation, the thesis introduces TGDMat, a text-guided joint diffusion framework that jointly models lattice parameters, atomic types, and atomic coordinates while incorporating textual structural knowledge during denoising. This enables the generation of more valid and stable periodic materials while also supporting conditional generation from natural-language descriptions. Overall, the thesis establishes a unified AI-based framework for data-efficient property prediction and controllable crystal generation, demonstrating how graph learning, multimodal representations, and generative models can reduce computational cost and improve the scalability of materials

Humans efficiently learn new tasks by reusing a rich repertoire of motor skills across different goals and contexts. A similar strategy can also be used to enable simulated characters to efficiently perform new tasks by leveraging reusable motor skills. To support a wide range of downstream tasks, the learned repertoire should be diverse, consisting of distinct behaviors as well as spatial and temporal variation within each behavior. A commonly used method for learning diverse skills is by maximizing the mutual information between skill latents and the states produced by a policy. The marginal state entropy promotes broad behavioral coverage, while the conditional entropy encourages consistent behaviors from each latent. However, directly estimating the marginal state entropy is intractable in high-dimensional control problems. Prior methods therefore rely on indirect latent-space approximations or coarse estimators of the state distribution. These approximations may not effectively promote broad coverage of the state space, resulting in skills with limited behavioral diversity and reduced utility for downstream tasks. In this work, we propose Diffusion Skill Discovery (DSD), a skill discovery method that uses a diffusion model to approximate the entropy gradient of the policy-induced state distribution through score matching. The resulting objective encourages the discovery of skills that produce a broader range of behaviors for high-dimensional humanoid control. The learned skills are reused in two downstream control settings: hierarchical control with a task-specific high-level policy and zero-shot control through latent selection from offline trajectories. Our experiments show that DSD discovers a broader repertoire of reusable motor skills than prior skill discovery methods, leading to the emergence of complex and agile behaviors that can be reused across downstream tasks.